Originally posted by baddog Those who fail to remember history are doomed to repeat it.
There will be a black man before there will be a white woman.
This has been tried before, and it failed then too.
My lord you're a redneck. Every other civilized nation in the world has had a female leader, you guys have to catch up one day, may as well be sooner then later.
Keep in mind not everyone voting in this election is a backwoods hick hiding his closet homosexuality with a beard and a tough guy attitude. Believe it or not you guys even gave WOMEN the right to vote!
Originally posted by Rich I still wouldn't bet that she's running, the Drudge report is probably the most unreliable piece of bullshit out there.
John Edwards was at the Bilderburg meeting this year, just like Gore was right before his run in 1992. Makes you think.
Source on Edwards being at the Bilderberg meeting:
This year Bilderberg has announced a list of attendees .
They include BP chief John Browne, US Senator John Edwards, World Bank president James Wolfensohn and Mrs Bill Gates
Originally posted by goBigtime It's the perfect testing of the waters for the Clinton camp to see how America feels about a woman for president -- without actually running the woman for president and risk losing.
She can lose here as VP, and the loss could be chalked up to other issues... but her camp can gather tons of valueable data while running.
And best case scenario for her, She wins on this ticket, and has to wait 8 years (as VP) to run as the first woman president.
Like I said.. it's a perfect win-win situation for the Clinton camp.
hillary is more of a "man" then most men in office now. she is aggressive and gathers information like a sponge. something tells me she would do very well as vp. if there was a man running who was like her, i would vote for him in a heartbeat.
that woman takes no shit.
her aggressiveness, unlike bush, is something most could deal with.
Comment