New rules on 2257

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Paul Markham
    Too old to care
    • Jun 2001
    • 52942

    #1

    New rules on 2257

    I could not find this any where, due to the search facility being down , and think everyone should know about it.

    So here it is again.

    This was posted by on elsewhere today and is VERY IMPORTANT.

    What is different? What are the new requirements?

    Full text can be found at: http://www.regulations.gov/freddocs/04-13792.htm

    Here are some major points that pertain to webmasters as secondary record keepers:

    a.. Internet Definitions. To bring the regulations up to date with the 2003 Amendments, the definition of a producer has been modified in proposed 28 CFR 75.1. Persons who manage the content of computer sites or services are considered secondary producers.

    a.. A secondary producer is any person who produces, assembles, manufactures, publishes, duplicates, reproduces, or reissues a book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, a computer-generated image, digital image, or picture, or other matter intended for commercial distribution that contains a visual depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct, or who inserts on a computer site or service a digital image of, or otherwise manages the content of a computer site or service that contains a visual depiction of, actual sexually explicit conduct, including any person who enters into a contract, agreement, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing.


    a.. Proposed 28 CFR 75.2(a)(1) would require computer site or service producers to maintain a ``hard'' physical or electronic copy of the actual depiction with the identification and age files, along with and linked to all accession information, such as each URL used for that depiction. This ensures that all of the data about all of the people in the depictions can be accessed to ensure that none of the people in the depictions are minors.


    a.. A producer who is a secondary producer as defined in Sec. 75.1(c) may satisfy the requirements of this part to create and maintain records by accepting from the primary producer, as defined in Sec. 75.1(c), copies of the records described in paragraph (a) of this section. Such a secondary producer shall also keep records of the name and address of the primary producer from whom he received copies of the records.

    You best keep up with this.
    Discuss.



    Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
    PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70
  • AaronM
    GFY Royality ;)
    • Oct 2001
    • 46917

    #2
    uh huh....Search works fine for those of us with half a clue.

    http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...hreadid=319663

    Comment

    • AaronM
      GFY Royality ;)
      • Oct 2001
      • 46917

      #3
      Here Paul...Let me help you.

      Here are all of the threads started in June that have 2257 mentioned in the title.

      http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...highlight=2257
      http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...highlight=2257
      http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...highlight=2257
      http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...highlight=2257
      http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...highlight=2257
      http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...highlight=2257
      http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...highlight=2257
      http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...highlight=2257

      Comment

      • EviLGuY
        So Fucking Banned
        • Apr 2003
        • 12745

        #4
        Originally posted by AaronM
        uh huh....Search works fine for those of us with half a clue.

        http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...hreadid=319663
        You should have posted that pic with the Cluepon.

        Comment

        • AaronM
          GFY Royality ;)
          • Oct 2001
          • 46917

          #5
          Originally posted by EviLGuY
          You should have posted that pic with the Cluepon.

          Naw...Can't be that mean to Paul. It's not his fault that is is an old goat who just does not understand them there computer things.

          Comment

          • Paul Markham
            Too old to care
            • Jun 2001
            • 52942

            #6
            This is the thread I was looking for.


            http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=319663

            And this is what I got on clicking on the search button

            http://www.gofuckyourself.com/search.php?s=

            So I'm stupid, but thanks for telling me guys.



            Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
            PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

            Comment

            • AaronM
              GFY Royality ;)
              • Oct 2001
              • 46917

              #7
              Originally posted by charly
              And this is what I got on clicking on the search button

              http://www.gofuckyourself.com/search.php?s=

              So I'm stupid, but thanks for telling me guys.

              Uh...Why would you click the search button? It has been disabled for a few months now.

              You must use the new GFY search tool.

              You have much to learn, Grasshopper.

              Comment

              • Paul Markham
                Too old to care
                • Jun 2001
                • 52942

                #8
                Let's face it this is not a "BOLT OUT OF THE BLUE" it was on the cards and you were warned.

                If your lawyer advised you to not have the documents and not check them then you can blame him. If you took this advice from some board member posing as a lawyer you can point the finger at yourself.



                Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                Comment

                • AaronM
                  GFY Royality ;)
                  • Oct 2001
                  • 46917

                  #9
                  Originally posted by charly
                  Let's face it this is not a "BOLT OUT OF THE BLUE" it was on the cards and you were warned.

                  If your lawyer advised you to not have the documents and not check them then you can blame him. If you took this advice from some board member posing as a lawyer you can point the finger at yourself.
                  LOL

                  Tell us again about US law.

                  Sunset vs. who?

                  Time will tell.

                  Comment

                  • Paul Markham
                    Too old to care
                    • Jun 2001
                    • 52942

                    #10
                    Originally posted by AaronM
                    LOL

                    Tell us again about US law.

                    Sunset vs. who?

                    Time will tell.
                    Maybe that's why he's closing the gaps. Go ask a lawyer and see what he advises.

                    Or do nothing and hope no one can find you. Commonly known as the Ostrich Defense.



                    Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                    PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                    Comment

                    • Lycanthrope
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 4517

                      #11
                      "a.. A secondary producer is any person who produces, assembles, manufactures, publishes, duplicates, reproduces, or reissues a book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, a computer-generated image, digital image, or picture, or other matter intended for commercial distribution that contains a visual depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct, or who inserts on a computer site or service a digital image of, or otherwise manages the content of a computer site or service that contains a visual depiction of, actual sexually explicit conduct, including any person who enters into a contract, agreement, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing."

                      This paragraph is a bit frightening... given the right judge and the wrong lawyer, wouldn't thumb preview tgps and perhaps even some banners fall under this?

                      Comment

                      • Paul Markham
                        Too old to care
                        • Jun 2001
                        • 52942

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Lycanthrope
                        "a.. A secondary producer is any person who produces, assembles, manufactures, publishes, duplicates, reproduces, or reissues a book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, a computer-generated image, digital image, or picture, or other matter intended for commercial distribution that contains a visual depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct, or who inserts on a computer site or service a digital image of, or otherwise manages the content of a computer site or service that contains a visual depiction of, actual sexually explicit conduct, including any person who enters into a contract, agreement, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing."

                        This paragraph is a bit frightening... given the right judge and the wrong lawyer, wouldn't thumb preview tgps and perhaps even some banners fall under this?
                        I think given any lawyer and any judge they fall under this.



                        Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                        PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                        Comment

                        • Lycanthrope
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 4517

                          #13
                          Originally posted by charly
                          I think given any lawyer and any judge they fall under this.
                          Yes, now that I re-read this after having my coffee it is pretty cut & dry.

                          hmmm.

                          Comment

                          • Paul Markham
                            Too old to care
                            • Jun 2001
                            • 52942

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Lycanthrope
                            Yes, now that I re-read this after having my coffee it is pretty cut & dry.

                            hmmm.
                            What Ashhahahahaha is trying to do is look good for his voters. This is an ammendment to an existing law, a tightening up. It passes around August, the election is November 2nd.

                            So reckon Ashhahahahaha is going to be very active with these new powers around September to November 1st. He will want lots of reasons for people to go out and vote for him.

                            He's not likely to get our vote, he looking to shore up the right.

                            Go ask a lawyer what you should do.



                            Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                            PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                            Comment

                            Working...