Yeah, CNN is not biased at all.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • gornyhuy
    Chafed.
    • May 2002
    • 18041
    #1

    Yeah, CNN is not biased at all.

    Look at the wording of their headline:

    "Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a law meant to punish pornographers who peddle dirty pictures to Web-surfing kids is probably an unconstitutional muzzle on free speech."

    The assumption is that the whole industry is actively targeting kids like a bunch of evil cretins and that the court is wimpering and giving into us because its "probably" unconstitutional.

    FUCK.

    Oh well, I'm hugely relieved that the ruling went the right way. Let 2 justices retire under a second Bush administration and see what happens though.

    icq:159548293
    Tags: None
    • egonetworks
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2004
      • 6706
      #2
      Shocking, a media outlet being biased? Whoa...

        Comment

        • Tom_PMs
          Confirmed User
          • Jun 2004
          • 2049
          #3
          Yeah that was the first sentance of the Associated Press release on it.

          Pissed me off too, because the law really seeks to make the internet in the USA alot like the internet in China. IMO.

          You've read it, you can't unread it.

            Comment

            • Manowar
              jellyfish  
              • Dec 2003
              • 71528
              #4
              "Smut Peddlers"

              this term is retarded

                Comment

                • Mr.Fiction
                  Confirmed User
                  • Feb 2002
                  • 9484
                  #5
                  What a fucked up quote, especially considering that porn sites weren't the ones challenging the law:

                  Plaintiffs in the COPA case include the American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression, Salon.com, ObGyn.net, Philadelphia Gay News and the Internet Content Coalition.

                  The law would have taken down many sites beyond just porn.
                  Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                    Comment

                    • gornyhuy
                      Chafed.
                      • May 2002
                      • 18041
                      #6
                      Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
                      What a fucked up quote, especially considering that porn sites weren't the ones challenging the law:

                      Plaintiffs in the COPA case include the American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression, Salon.com, ObGyn.net, Philadelphia Gay News and the Internet Content Coalition.

                      The law would have taken down many sites beyond just porn.
                      Would you PLEASE stop talking sense and pick up a torch like the rest of the mindless drones... Thanks.

                      icq:159548293

                        Comment

                        Previous template Next
                        Working...