Thread: (pic)
View Single Post
Old 04-17-2005, 02:34 AM  
2HousePlague
CURATOR
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: the attic
Posts: 14,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phill
Quote:
A court case in 1999 determined that mere nudity involving minors does not come under the federal definition of child porn, nor does it necessarily qualify as obscene, as the Supreme Court had ruled previously that mere nudity in and of itself does not constitute obscenity.
Did not know that, thanks.


j-
__________________
tada!
2HousePlague is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote