no no.. look at the helmet.. you see the light source there, (sun), but how can the shadow go towards the sun? thats.. erhm. not possible.. also remember they didnt have flashlight
-
SEO since 2002 - Google Index Record: 32 minutes. - Selling SEO services and tools -
He just got a flashlight up his assOriginally posted by Fabuleux
Shadows look ok, but I agree with the light source. Give me a sec on that one haha.
Comment
-
Although this is a funny conversation, you all should check this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_...ax_accusations
Comment
-
quote from the above page:
"Shadows on the Moon are complicated because there are several light sources; the Sun, Earth and the Moon itself"
yeah right.. the light source of the earth is brighter than the one from the sun..
so much blabla on that page ;)SEO since 2002 - Google Index Record: 32 minutes. - Selling SEO services and toolsComment
-
http://www.clavius.org/manmoon.htmlOriginally posted by Peacemaker
and something is so wrong in this pic.. look at the light source and the shadows..
Comment
-
!
SEO since 2002 - Google Index Record: 32 minutes. - Selling SEO services and toolsComment
-
same
SEO since 2002 - Google Index Record: 32 minutes. - Selling SEO services and toolsComment
-
-
what about that?
SEO since 2002 - Google Index Record: 32 minutes. - Selling SEO services and toolsComment
-
You don't give up do you?Originally posted by Peacemaker
what about that?
I don't know what that is.Comment
-
If the moon landing is not true, ther must bee at least a 100 people that know about it.. how can they keep ther mouth shoot 4 so longe?Comment
-
no, i dont give up ;)Originally posted by Fabuleux
You don't give up do you?
I don't know what that is.
arcording to nasa, they made 2 videos at DIFFERENT location at a different time. but as you see, its the same location.
you should watch the "Fox TV and the Apollo Moon Hoax" "Did We Land on the Moon?" to understand better
SEO since 2002 - Google Index Record: 32 minutes. - Selling SEO services and toolsComment
-
why 100 people? just some need to be involved.. (the "actors")..Originally posted by tdp-Cool-content
If the moon landing is not true, ther must bee at least a 100 people that know about it.. how can they keep ther mouth shoot 4 so longe?
quote: "10 astronauts died "under mysterious circumstances" during Apollo".... stronaut deaths: Ed Givens (car accident), Ted Freeman (T-38 crash), C. C. Williams (T-38 accident), Elliot See and Charlie Bassett (T-38 accident), Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee (Apollo 1 fire). .. etc.SEO since 2002 - Google Index Record: 32 minutes. - Selling SEO services and toolsComment
-
now that's some spooky shit....Originally posted by Peacemaker
why 100 people? just some need to be involved.. (the "actors")..
quote: "10 astronauts died "under mysterious circumstances" during Apollo".... stronaut deaths: Ed Givens (car accident), Ted Freeman (T-38 crash), C. C. Williams (T-38 accident), Elliot See and Charlie Bassett (T-38 accident), Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee (Apollo 1 fire). .. etc.Comment
-
Dude its a fake suit prolly weighs nothing you fucking retard geez.Originally posted by Fabuleux
Try to jump that high with a suite that heavy.
Comment
-
Fabuleux: i ll come back later, need to go.. nice discussion ;)SEO since 2002 - Google Index Record: 32 minutes. - Selling SEO services and toolsComment
-
I wouldn't put it past our government to have faked the moon landings. But there were several of them if you recall, and with that many people involved it'd be tough to keep that big of a farse secret.
If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed DomainsComment
-
Please disregard the fucking retard comment I lost my mind there. Sorry. Comment
-
Theres alot of people who havn't kept it secret but since the the gob'ment said its true its "true".Originally posted by KRL
I wouldn't put it past our government to have faked the moon landings. But there were several of them if you recall, and with that many people involved it'd be tough to keep that big of a farse secret. Comment
-
All of that stuff is suspect.... highly.
Here's the one thing that's always baffled me...
I borrowed this image, now... all the obvious things aside, look under the lander. This lander uses 25000 pounds of thrust under that thing... let's say while landing that it uses only a fraction of that even. Well, on a surface that is nothing but loose and very dry dirt.... uhmm.... would it really look that nice and tidy? Wouldn't there be a bit of a crater or something????
Comment
-
oh yeah, forgot to answer the question.
It's my opinion, based on my own observations, plus as everyone else has said... the fact that nasa, it seems, hasn't been able to put anyone on the moon since... that the last lunar landing has actually yet to happen.
I believe, with 99% assuradness, that there has been no lunar landing yet.Comment
-
so whats the consensus we were duped or not?the hun gets revenue from pre-paid gallery placements on the top 15 spaces and banners.
the rest of thegalleries are free placements.Comment
-
That's like asking the question "Who really killed Kennedy?"Originally posted by Global Dialers
so whats the consensus we were duped or not?
We're never going to know the truth. If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed DomainsComment
-
getting something into orbit is not the problem, all you have to do for there is get past the atmosphere and the gravitational pull will allow it to stay in orbit. This is why we have the moon. The problem is getting it all to line up, from here to the moon orbit, shuttle to lander, lander to moon, lander to shuttle, shuttle to earth. Sorry to many limiting reagants such as the efficiency of the fuel, the mass of the vehicles you are talking about, and the limitations of the pilots life support systems.Originally posted by Fabuleux
Simpel question. There are no satellites? Without you couldn't have seen the war in Iraq live. There circle in a 0.000001mm precise orbit. First satillite was broadcasting data 4th october of 1957.
A launch from the moon costs far less energy then a launch from earth, there is no atmosphere and gravity is 7 times lower.
The space suits are said to be kinda heavy but i can not remember the exact weight, i guess if you took the weight of the suit, did some math to figure out how much force the astranauts could produce by jumping in it and took into account the lower gravity you could tell if the jump height was correct.......even ADULTS need TOYS
icq: 3 6 3 2 6 6 6 7 | aim: conglomorateman
open for business, affiliates and friendshipsComment
-
actually the maiden flight was 1959 it started regular recon in 64......Originally posted by Fabuleux
The fastest airplaine ever build is the Lockheed Martin SR-71A Blackbird and it's first flight was in 1965. Don't think we didn't have the knowlegde back then.
By the way, I study Flight and airospace technology
even ADULTS need TOYS
icq: 3 6 3 2 6 6 6 7 | aim: conglomorateman
open for business, affiliates and friendshipsComment
-
OMG!Comment
-
So.. Why dont we get one of our fancy telescopes, zoom in on the moon and look for that flag we supposedly left there?.... Problem solved.Comment
-
Originally posted by STiNKyMeAT
So.. Why dont we get one of our fancy telescopes, zoom in on the moon and look for that flag we supposedly left there?.... Problem solved.
We've already tried and no on has ever found evidence we were there. Including the fact we supposedly left the botton of the lander and a fucking car! Comment
-
it wouldnt suprise me if it was faked.Comment
-
Form your own opinions based upon facts... http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.htmlI'm not a porn monger. I'm a porn ... STYLIST!
Buildit Cheap, build it Fast, Build it Right. - Pick Two.Comment
-
and what da hell is that?!
Comment
-
Funny how the 'wind' only 'blows' the flag when an astronaut is moving the flagpole around. Show me the flag blowing without anybody shaking the flagpole.
Originally posted by MrJackMeHoff
Here is the wind blowing flag:
http://www.ufos-aliens.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Apollo1.rm
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peacemaker
same
While your theory of the light looks good at first glance, I hate to say, that most likely you are wrong on this.
For that path to be correct ( the one you have drawn) the light source would have to have been VERY close to your converging point. To make those shadows have the correct angle as you say.PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic
AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!Comment
-
that's fuckin great - i laughed tears!
Comment
Comment