So, where can I read this bill that outlaws inserting a fist into a vagina and/or taking pictures of it? Laws must be voted on then written down and officially recorded.. right? Who passed this law?
Originally posted by CamChicks So, where can I read this bill that outlaws inserting a fist into a vagina and/or taking pictures of it? Laws must be voted on then written down and officially recorded.. right? Who passed this law?
Whoever passed it is a cracksmoker.
Ohhhh, fisting... it's the end of the world. If a chick doesn't want me to stick my hand in her, I'm sure she'll tell me. The church doesn't agree with it, so let's all pass laws against it. hahahahaha
fisting, peeing, pooping, two cocks simulatneously in a girls mouth, or anything that is degrading to a woman is considered obscene. Now the fact is whether or not they will get a conviction is a different story. If you live in the enlightened east or west i would highly doubt it, but down south you're toast. It mainly depends on location. Imaginge showing two guys urinating in a girls mouth to a jury in california or new york city and then showing that same vid to a couple of hillbillys in west varginia. That's how obscenity is won and lost. It really has nothing to due about the type of material because anything can be coinsidered obscene. A breast is obscene in tennessee. Best way is to keep doing what you do, and save for a future defense.
Duke
Originally posted by B-Eazy The love the site fisting lessons. I am pretty damn sure i have almost fisted girls before. 100% got 4 fingers in.. Next time ill go for 5
Originally posted by More Booze ..I live in a country where fisting content is legal.
That does not matter does it? Its still illegal for me to have that content hosted there?
Not an attorney, but think the issue is yet to be decided. Is publication where the material is hosted, where the material was produced or where it was seen?
I think there is case law in Australia on the subject that says its where the material is viewed - at the PC where it was downloaded. I don't think think there is statute or case law on it in the US. If you ask John Asshat, I'm sure he'd put ya in a secret jail somewhere.
Guess those $300/hr attorneys don't tune into GFY. Besides, they'd prolly have to research it or assign a clerk.
Originally posted by pussyluver Not an attorney, but think the issue is yet to be decided. Is publication where the material is hosted, where the material was produced or where it was seen?
I think there is case law in Australia on the subject that says its where the material is viewed - at the PC where it was downloaded. I don't think think there is statute or case law on it in the US. If you ask John Asshat, I'm sure he'd put ya in a secret jail somewhere.
Guess those $300/hr attorneys don't tune into GFY. Besides, they'd prolly have to research it or assign a clerk.
On second thought there may be some case law in US. Fuck, a nagging question. Now I'll have to track this down a bit. Think someone got dragged into Indiana from afar. Most of the time, I think jurisdiction is where you live. Cause the material would be on your own PC. If you're really kwel, you could remote terminal into a computer off-shore. Now that would make for a messy litigation. I'd bet there is some risk where the material is hosted.
Comment