Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FightThisPatent
V_rocks,
in reading post, it is very confusing.
Some facts from your post:
1) you received an email from Stafford at python
2) Stafford wrote in his email to you that ASACP had contacted him about your universaltgp.com website and inappropriate content.
3) you then say you submitted your TGP to ASACP for review.
4) you said you got a response back with the folllowing:
"We could not determine whether the models are
`clearly` under the age of 18; therefore, we are
unable to report the website to the authorities. "
-----------------------------------------------
Let start with #3, so did you apply for ASACP membership?
The response in #4 sounds like something that would have been sent in response to someone who had submitted a suspected CP website to ASACP. The response clearly says that universaltgp.com was not reported as having CP.
So to fact #1, it appears that whoever submitted the CP lead for universaltgp.com didn't like the ASACP response that it COULDN'T report the site, and went to find one of your sponsors.
They probably forwarded the text in #4 to Python, that reached Stafford who took a look at universaltgp.com and saw alot of very young looking girls, and decided to drop your account.
As Joan has written, the text from #4 was ONLY sent to the person that submitted the CP lead. The ONLY way that Python would have seen this text is if the submitter contacted Python.
So given these observations, it appears that ASACP didn't "rat" you out to anyone.
If Python wants to drop you because your thumbs look really, really young, that's their right, and if you have a problem with that, you should be posting the thread title as being Fuck Python!
If the way i see it is true, based on the facts presented, then you owe ASACP an apology.
Fight the Fire Alarms!
|
I sent them my own link, and that was their reply. This TGP shares a DB with 5 other websites I own. I submitted them all myself and got a clean bill of health back on all of them. The reply is in my email box. I sent it to Python in response as a sort of, hmmm... we are getting conflicting emails about my site. They are telling me it is OK and you that it has CP? Weird.
I talked to Python and showed them all of my 2257 data that I collected on my galleries. I challenge any TGP to be as thourough as I have been. I have collected more specific 2257 data on my galleries than any other TGP in the history of TGP's!
Everything is squared away with Python... they see my evidence and agree with me. I am clean. But the ASACP told them I am not. So my beef is still with them. Why have they not contacted me about it? Is that to hard? I sent Joan and email and another to
[email protected] and I got zero reply from either of them even though Joan asked me to send her an email.
I would love to appologize once we have discussed the situation. Until then, I am waiting for the ASACP's reply.