|
Lenny the risk is in shooting exclusive.
Because you have 1-5 clients, who are in fact your boss and if you lost one you would be in trouble. I have 100s none of whom would hurt me if they decided to buy elsewhere.
The demand it seems is in non exclusive, simply because there are more people buying non exclusive than excluisve today.
With non exclusive I can afford to pay the model myself, I also know what a girl is worth (subject to market fluctuations) and I'm making a lot more money than the exclusive shooters.
A few big buyers paying $300 to $500 for a set/video for solo, $1200 to $1500 for lesbian and $2,000 to $3,000 for boy girl are not coming anywhere near what I earn from the same work.
You say that exclusive is the way to go because it's not saturated on the Net, now you tell us that the shooters shooting exclusive are better off shooting it. So which one is right, can't be both. Unless you are paying a lot more than the prices I quoted.
Truth is todays surfer is spoiled, the first thing he looks at is the model and the porn. Are they right, is it his niche and has he seen them before? The fact that it's exclusive does not matter if the three are not met.
So if selling a set 20 times, give me more money than shooting it exclusive I know which way I'm going. I doubt if you pay for the image set what we earn from a magazine sale of a set.
Yes there are shooters who cannot shoot porn, pointing a camera at a naked girl is not porn, and these guys approach me all the time to buy or broker their work. I'm talking about people who can shoot a different standard.
Show me the exclusive shooter, with my set up and I may listen to you. Most work out of their living rooms.
|