Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rankscom
The only way DRM will become transparent is if it was removed completely. The point of DRM is to put restrictions on the files use. It's definitely more user friendly than earlier versions (less bugs), which is good.
|
Yes you are right. To restrict the files in use.
Translation to allow play when permitted. Just like Pay Per view on Cable.
One has to be a subscriber to the carrier. No cable, no stream.
Pay Perview on television is $3.95 and requires network subscriber through the cable service up to 50 dollars a month. Cable Networks is a subscription based service akin to a member site.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rankscom
DRM also doesn't prevent users from sharing their pw's, which is probably a bigger problem. So even if a user has a password to play the DRM'ed file, it doesn't mean they're a paying member.
|
Ya heard of Strongbox? How about Pennywise? These are security systems for websites to protect members area's from violators. How well versed are you and how qualified are you to review adult sites not understanding the fundamentals?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rankscom
I think a user is more likely to renew their membership to a site not using DRM, than a site with it. I've also heard a few webmasters who've used DRM, and ended up removing it when their retention levels dropped.
|
So in otherwards people were happy taking the content and not paying for it when they have accessed the site in good faith.
You have indirectly also stated that Many subscribers want to edit video?WTF? Ya mean according to what you know about subscribers they like to download movie files to edit them? This does not make sense to and is entirelly new, also remastering works makes it more difficult to capture copyright violators.