discuss... this was called a non-goal with 5:58 left in the game which would give calgary a 3:2 lead.
-
discuss... this was called a non-goal with 5:58 left in the game which would give calgary a 3:2 lead. -
its a no goal -
Seems no goal to me.
Comment
-
It was in. But hey can't go back on it now.Comment
-
some angles made it look like a goal, others made it look no good. It has to be a forsure deal or no goal.Comment
-
thats a bullshit angle, they were showin that one on t.v. too, 10 to 1 that if they showed it on a straight angle its a forsure goalComment
-
It was a hard call.Originally posted by 4Pics
some angles made it look like a goal, others made it look no good. It has to be a forsure deal or no goal.AMK Hosting - 3.2Ghz, 1GB RAM, 2x300GB RAID1 + 10Mbps for $249mo.
ICQ: 15898919 - Ask me about remote backups for your data.Comment
-
If it wasn't a goal, it wasn't a goal.........it doesn't matter what we sayComment
-
Can't see shit...on the pic...If lesbian anal is wrong, I don't want to be right.Comment
-
You can't tell if it was a goal or not cause the puck was in the air on edge. So on other words, if the goal is indecisive, then it's ruled as a no goal.Comment
-
I can't see the puck on the pic
sig for sale.
ICQ :338213644Comment
-
The refs nor any players knew where the puck was.. so the ref really wasn't watching well enough.. I'm sure some university student or prof will figure out the angle of the different camera shots and then measure the distance to see if it was indeed behind the line...Originally posted by hova
If it wasn't a goal, it wasn't a goal.........it doesn't matter what we say
Cheers,
MattWhat name is pr0 / Untouched Markets using these days? Untouched Markets - pr0 - Refund My Money Now
Someone owes me $2,000 because they didn't do any work that was paid for *pointing at pr0 / William / UntouchedMarkets*
See http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?p=16744521 and for more detailed see http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=948645Comment
-
Think Dallas Stanley Cup game 7 and then ask again.....Comment
-
that was no friggin goal, but nice try, it will no doubt make a nice and handy excuse for Calgary fans for the next 50 years should they lose tonight.I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!Comment
-
I'm all for calgary , but , that picture isn't at the right angle to judge if its over or not. Very hard to seeI sale Cheap organsComment
-
I thought it looked like a goal on tv but I didnt realize it was in the air so now I dunno.
Comment
-
The picture in the Calgary Sun pretty much solved this discussion. The angle is directly from the side...and the puck did not go over the line.Comment
-
Originally posted by BradM
It was in. But hey can't go back on it now.ICQ-46523581Comment
-
I think it was in but doesn't mean shit now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jimholio
Think Dallas Stanley Cup game 7 and then ask again.....
You mean game 6, ;-)Comment
-
right....game 6Originally posted by Vitasoy
You mean game 6, ;-)Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mastamindz
Who cares. Calgary will win tonight anyway
They'll have to come from behind...
Comment
-
Thats ok, we canadians are used to being on topOriginally posted by Vitasoy
They'll have to come from behind...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vitasoy
You can't tell if it was a goal or not cause the puck was in the air on edge. So on other words, if the goal is indecisive, then it's ruled as a no goal.
Comment
-
can't really see shit captainICQ # 916111Comment
-
Originally posted by mastamindz
Thats ok, we canadians are used to being on top
That's the spirit!
Comment
-
Its stupid that they dont have a camera directly above the line, or even built into the pol so there no way to miss a goal. you cant tell if this puck is touching the ice or not so it has to be no goalComment
-
Looks like a goal to me..Comment
-
Of all the replays I've seen its hard to tell.. but it doesnt look like a goal.. close but not quite..
ICQ: #126013016 :: Amateur IndexComment
Comment