View Single Post
Old 03-20-2005, 04:48 AM  
arnette
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 283
Franck: it is built on win2k, and you could call it 'user friendly' although i think the extras are pretty much a pile of junk.

perfectodollars-gabrio: absolutely right, i have seen recently that some software, like windows media player 10, isnt been offered to 2k users.

Stamen: no way, XP networking is heaps easier than 2k.

IdealBandwidth: 2k does support hyperthreading, im using it on this machine right now.

gecko: i dont know what you are doing but ive been running 2k since it came out and i have never had a single crash, ever. with 98/98se i had them at least once every 2 days.

Myst: XP boots faster, about 60% of the time 2k takes to boot, as far as running, xp is a little slower, but not a whole lot.

My preference is to use 2k, i generally dont upgrade my OS unless there is something that my current one wont do, which I havent found yet with 2k. I also hate the bloated interface of xp, although this can be changed.
arnette is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote