Originall posted by bluedevil what all of you are saying is that Americans and the interests of America are more important than other people... your saying American life is worth more than other life...if that's not the belief of an evil doer...i dunno what is...
Originally posted by theking I do not deny it...I live in the real world...not some idealistic world that will never exist...at least in your lifetime and mine.
i just read this again...you are agreeing your an evil do-er...way to go boss
he's probably inbreed who in there right mind who support that jerk off bush is the reason this country is in shambles why do you think theres a HUGE amount of controversy behind everything he says and does are you fucking stupid this isn't his war. end of story.
Originally posted by sexxxychat69 Does Anyone Here Support George Bush ? It seems like more and more people are turning against him. I still haven't made up my mind. I think both sides have valid points but I think I?m just more confused than anything What do you think about this big fucking mess were in?ak47:
this is one hell of a confusing world... but i don't agree with him
#6. Iraq is a strategic piece of real estate for future military operations against our enemies in the region, which number in the 100's of millions.
#7. Iraq is a strategic piece of real estate for its oil fields and for the surrounding oil fields, for as the worlds oil supplies dwindle the USA will be in a position to control the dwindling oil supplies for its use and the use of its European allies.
#8. A take over of Iraq sends a very powerful signal to the other countries in that area of the world that if they don't get their act together they will be next.
Any one of the reasons above is a reason for war.
Those are the real reasons, of course. If Bush had come out at the beginning and admitted these were his reasons, I could almost support him in it. Iraq is a key square on the chessboard, as it were, and an American presence there would help start the westernization of the Middle East. But he had to lie about it.
I don't buy that the intelligence gathering of the most powerful nation in the world is that slapdash. Sorry. If they know what library books are being borrowed and who met who on a bus three years ago, then I think they would know whether or not it was likely that Saddam had WMD's. In fact, Blix said they were most likely nonexistant. But no, Bush had to go in with an ARMY to "make sure". Wouldn't a few good CIA operatives have done a better job of sniffing around the desert, maybe assassinating Saddam on the way?
No, because once Saddam was removed from power, Bush had to ensure that the Americans were in place to stabilize the region and to select the successor.
And that is the real reason, of course. Future-thinking and all that, it's brilliant. BUT just stop lying to us. If he would stop lying, then the American public could actually decide based on the truth, whether or not they want to pursue this venture.
Originally posted by BlingDaddy If Gore were President we'd all be fucked and getting bombed on a daily basis by terrorist who think it's cool to attack the US.
Yeah, just like when he was Vice President for 8 years.
Originally posted by BlingDaddy Why don't you explain the Geneva Convention to the 18,000 Kurds who were gassed by Saddam Hussein and the 3,000 plus dead Americans in the WTC. That's 20,000 reason to invade any country the US thinks is terrorist.
Comment