Excalibur sued by ex-porn actress

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jdobypr
    Registered User
    • May 2004
    • 1

    #1

    Excalibur sued by ex-porn actress

    One of the few former adult film survivors, Ms. Heidi Nelson-Grossman, aka Heidi Cat, announced a multi-count, multi-million dollar lawsuit filed in Van Nuys, CA the porn capitol of the world, against Excalibur Entertainment Inc., the world?s largest distributor of XXX movies. Heidi quit the industry prior to the birth of the Internet thirteen years ago and has since reformed her life. Excalibur has marketed and sold products using Heidi?s real name, image and likeness to present date. Excalibur Films incorrectly credits Heidi with over 150 adult films. She never appears in many of the films being sold on an unauthorized Web page made by Excalibur. Further, Excalibur has marketed and sold Compilation Films, DVD?s, CD-ROM?s, Movie Trailer, VHS, and a Slide Show, none of which she agreed to, new about, or was paid. It is estimated that Excalibur Films, its subsidiaries, affiliates and/or agents, have profited millions of dollars from the unauthorized use of Heidi?s name, image, and likeness whether or not she actually appeared in the products being sold.
  • eroswebmaster
    March 1st, 2003
    • Jul 2001
    • 20295

    #2
    Interesting first post.
    For rent - ICQ 127-027-910
    Click here for more details

    Comment

    • Lycanthrope
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2004
      • 4517

      #3
      Well at least she is suing for what may be a legitimate reason... but that's obviously a contractual issue for the lawyers & courts to figure out.

      However, it is refreshing to see a "real" argument in today's "blame others then try to profit from your own mistakes" society.

      Comment

      • Mr. Marks
        Confirmed User
        • Jun 2001
        • 7517

        #4
        Let's just hope that she'll emerge victorious (wtf?)

        Comment

        • JDog
          Confirmed User
          • Feb 2003
          • 7453

          #5
          Now that is a useful first post! I hope she comes out of this good!

          jDoG
          NSCash now powering ReelProfits.com
          ALSO FEATURING: NSCash.com :: SoloDollars.com :: ReelProfits.com :: BiminiBucks.com :: VOD
          PROGRAMS COMING SOON: Greedy Bucks :: Vengeance Cash
          NOW OFFERING OVER 60 SITES
          CONTACT :: JAMES SMITH :: CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER :: ICQ (711385133)

          Comment

          • SykkBoy2
            Jesus loves bacon
            • Feb 2001
            • 19969

            #6
            Originally posted by jdobypr
            One of the few former adult film survivors, Ms. Heidi Nelson-Grossman, aka Heidi Cat, announced a multi-count, multi-million dollar lawsuit filed in Van Nuys, CA the porn capitol of the world, against Excalibur Entertainment Inc., the world?s largest distributor of XXX movies. Heidi quit the industry prior to the birth of the Internet thirteen years ago and has since reformed her life. Excalibur has marketed and sold products using Heidi?s real name, image and likeness to present date. Excalibur Films incorrectly credits Heidi with over 150 adult films. She never appears in many of the films being sold on an unauthorized Web page made by Excalibur. Further, Excalibur has marketed and sold Compilation Films, DVD?s, CD-ROM?s, Movie Trailer, VHS, and a Slide Show, none of which she agreed to, new about, or was paid. It is estimated that Excalibur Films, its subsidiaries, affiliates and/or agents, have profited millions of dollars from the unauthorized use of Heidi?s name, image, and likeness whether or not she actually appeared in the products being sold.
            yup, it sucks porn stars don't have a lot of the same royalty/likeness rights as "legit" performers...
            Support my new movie “The Second Coming”

            Comment

            • tony299
              lurker
              • Aug 2002
              • 57021

              #7
              If she signed model releases doesnt she really have no rights?

              Comment

              • EviLGuY
                So Fucking Banned
                • Apr 2003
                • 12745

                #8
                People sue other people for just about anything.. I dont see the news.

                Comment

                • AMADude
                  Confirmed User
                  • Apr 2004
                  • 3875

                  #9
                  Originally posted by eroswebmaster
                  Interesting first post.
                  No sig, just here to fuck around.

                  Comment

                  • cspdinc
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 724

                    #10
                    our contracts include

                    " ...THE UNRESTRICTED RIGHTS AND PERMISSION NOW AND HEREAFTER TO COPYRIGHT AND TO USE, DISPLAY, SELL, PUBLISH, AND REUSE AND REPUBLISH ANY AND ALL IMAGES (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY AND ALL VISUAL, AUDIO, AND OTHER IMAGES OR IMPRESSIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS, NEGATIVES, SLIDES, VIDEO AND AUDIO RECORDINGS, MOVING PICTURES, DIGITAL IMAGES AND ANY OTHER ORIGINAL OR DERIVED WORKS) OF MYSELF. I GRANT THIS PERMISSION IN PERPETUITY IN MY OWN BEHALF AND ON THE BEHALF OF MY ESTATE IN THE EVENT OF MY DEATH. THIS DOCUMENT COVERS ALL USES AND PURPOSES (ALL USES IN ALL CURRENT AND ANY FUTURE MEDIA TYPES THE PHOTOGRAPHER AND ASSOCIATES CHOSE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ILLISTRATION, ADVERTISING, ART, PUBLICATIONS, TRADE, COLLECTIONS, REPRODUCTIONS, PROMOTIONS, EDITORIAL, BROADCAST, PRODUCTS AND SALES)...

                    that pretty much covers any invention of say, crystal storage technology or holographic characters currently being looked into for desktop presentations.

                    But in the early 80s late 70 who was thinking so outside the box like humans do now. I feel her pain but if she signed away her rights shes probably not going to benefit, my

                    Comment

                    Working...