Quote:
|
Originally Posted by titmowse
I said the Clinton spent less than Bush. As far as Clinton's military spending is concerned, I assume you mean that if he had spent more, 9/11 wouldn't have happened? While the Pentagon USED to have control over intelligence spending, I need you to explain to me how more bombs and tanks and missiles would have prevented 9/11.
1) I said Clinton spent less money that Bush has.
2) Gore's Initiative to Streamline Government was about cutting waste, not spending. There's a difference
|
Waste and spending are semantics.
I may consider waste, what you consider spending.
For example, one of the 15 labs being paid to study the growing habits of the grapefruit is not conisdered useful spending unless you work in that lab.
Another example is a leader of our government cutting funing so NASA is forced to retrieve million dollar satelites with fishing poles is an example of what?