More already watching it on the news
Mustard gas found in Iraq
Collapse
X
-
Even if he had that many, you think he is a threat to America?Originally posted by kenny
What if they find all 550 of them?
The ones that the UN knew Saddam hadLooking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos.
With TOP RATIO Sites like
ATMovs.com | iTeenVideo.com | TeenSexMovs.com | TeenSexMania.com
Comment
-
How can you NOT think he was a threat to the US?Originally posted by VeriSexy
Even if he had that many, you think he is a threat to America?
An IMMEDIATE threat, maybe not. Given enough time and resources he could have done some serious damage. He may not have been able to completely destroy the US, but he could have still done damage.[URL=http://www.stupidcash.com/referral=sailorslut/]
[/URLComment
-
With what? You think Iraq has the power to develop ICBMs?Originally posted by StRoGE
How can you NOT think he was a threat to the US?
An IMMEDIATE threat, maybe not. Given enough time and resources he could have done some serious damage. He may not have been able to completely destroy the US, but he could have still done damage.Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos.
With TOP RATIO Sites like
ATMovs.com | iTeenVideo.com | TeenSexMovs.com | TeenSexMania.com
Comment
-
He was a old fucking man what the fuck was he waiting for. Supposedly worth 50 billion dollars and he couldnt buy wmd's ? If he really wanted them.Originally posted by StRoGE
How can you NOT think he was a threat to the US?
An IMMEDIATE threat, maybe not. Given enough time and resources he could have done some serious damage. He may not have been able to completely destroy the US, but he could have still done damage.Comment
-
my point is this: who the fuck are we; the world's police force?if you arent promoting http://www.10dollarcash.com you are a fuckin moronComment
-
Sounds like something that came out of bushes mouth.Originally posted by kenny
Iraq has the power to disturbute chemical weapons for a shared interest
No they don't unless they plan to smuggle the weapons into the USA with freaking fishing boats. Plus they have to smuggle a shitload which would be impossible.
I guess you have no idea what a ICBM is and how complicated they are. We are talking about missiles that can go from Iraq all the way to USA. You think a country like Iraq can develop something like that? You got to be kidding me
Last edited by VeriSexy; 05-17-2004, 08:27 AM.Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos.
With TOP RATIO Sites like
ATMovs.com | iTeenVideo.com | TeenSexMovs.com | TeenSexMania.com
Comment
-
No we are a country that happens to account for 25% of the world's economy. By doing so it requires us to act upon international interest.Originally posted by count blingula
my point is this: who the fuck are we; the world's police force?
We lost so much money after the market fell apart after 911 we simply cant afford a possible threatLast edited by kenny; 05-17-2004, 08:27 AM.7Comment
-
yeah, a fishing boat to mexico, then a truck to the usOriginally posted by VeriSexy
Sounds like something that came out of bushes mouth.
No they don't unless they plan to smuggle the weapons into the USA with freaking fishing boats. Plus they have to smuggle a shitload which would be impossible.
I guess you have no idea what a ICBM is and how complicated they are. We are talking about missiles that can go from Iraq all the way to USA. You think a country like Iraq can develop something like that? You go to be kidding me
333-765-551Comment
-
Better start going through every single Middle Eastern Country now. Chances are you will find Mustard gas in most of them and I am sure in a weaponized form.
Yes Saddam was a threat and had to be dealth with but imminent no. Rush will have a blast with this one. Just when Bush is falling in the polls they so happen to find something. More rabbits to be pulled out of the hat come election time.Living in Virtual Reality
Contact: Email (preferred): furiousmale .at. gmail - Skype: live:shanedwsComment
-
It would take hundreds of thousands of truckloads and I am sure the CIA would catch them pretty easilyOriginally posted by bringer
yeah, a fishing boat to mexico, then a truck to the usLooking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos.
With TOP RATIO Sites like
ATMovs.com | iTeenVideo.com | TeenSexMovs.com | TeenSexMania.com
Comment
-
You really believe Saddam would have smuggle hundreds of thousands of tons of Sarin and Mustard gas into the US by truck? LOL if he really wanted to and if it was that easy, then he could have done it 10 years agoOriginally posted by kenny
You smuggle things in the US by putting them in cargo.
Only a small % of cargo is currently inspected
You crack me upLooking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos.
With TOP RATIO Sites like
ATMovs.com | iTeenVideo.com | TeenSexMovs.com | TeenSexMania.com
Comment
-
Perhaps we should have put a portion of the funds that went into the war towards better inspection of incoming over seas cargo. Tighten up our shores instead of causing a complete melee in the middle east.Originally posted by kenny
You smuggle things in the US by putting them in cargo.
Only a small % of cargo is currently inspected
I am not saying we should have ignored Saddam but he wasnt priority 1 at the time.Living in Virtual Reality
Contact: Email (preferred): furiousmale .at. gmail - Skype: live:shanedwsComment
-
It wouldnt take "tons" of nerve gas to fuck up the US economy.Originally posted by VeriSexy
You really believe Saddam would have smuggle hundreds of thousands of tons of Sarin and Mustard gas into the US by truck? LOL if he really wanted to and if it was that easy, then he could have done it 10 years ago
You crack me up
A little bit released in a New York subway would do the job.
And terrorist have already been expected to exploit the flaws in our current sea ports7Comment
-
Why not do both?Originally posted by Furious_Male
Perhaps we should have put a portion of the funds that went into the war towards better inspection of incoming over seas cargo. Tighten up our shores instead of causing a complete melee in the middle east.
I am not saying we should have ignored Saddam but he wasnt priority 1 at the time.
Secure the ports and eliminate possible threats7Comment
-
Hundreds of thousands of truckloads to accomplish what?Originally posted by VeriSexy
It would take hundreds of thousands of truckloads and I am sure the CIA would catch them pretty easily
They dont need to kill everyone in the US to do damage. Knock out ONE important person and you'll have chaos, which is really all they want to accomplish.
As much as people bash bush, could you imagine if he was killed by an isolated terrorist attack? It would be pure mayhem.[URL=http://www.stupidcash.com/referral=sailorslut/]
[/URLComment
-
he he he .....they were going to be using Flying CarpetsOriginally posted by VeriSexy
Sounds like something that came out of bushes mouth.
No they don't unless they plan to smuggle the weapons into the USA with freaking fishing boats. Plus they have to smuggle a shitload which would be impossible.
I guess you have no idea what a ICBM is and how complicated they are. We are talking about missiles that can go from Iraq all the way to USA. You think a country like Iraq can develop something like that? You got to be kidding me

FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot comComment
-
I agree but I think more thought should have went into this Iraq offensive. They were not priority 1.Originally posted by kenny
Why not do both?
Secure the ports and eliminate possible threatsLiving in Virtual Reality
Contact: Email (preferred): furiousmale .at. gmail - Skype: live:shanedwsComment
-
A little bit? You remember when that happened in Japan? It did squat compared to what happened on 911. Seriously, you can do allot more damage if they ran into a subway arming with guns and started shooting columbine style.Originally posted by kenny
It wouldnt take "tons" of nerve gas to fuck up the US economy.
A little bit released in a New York subway would do the job.
And terrorist have already been expected to exploit the flaws in our current sea ports
In order to do massive damage you would need a shitload of nerve gas in a pretty good condition. You need heavy concentration.
Just like the anthrax scares and how the media blow it out of proportion. How many people really died from it?Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos.
With TOP RATIO Sites like
ATMovs.com | iTeenVideo.com | TeenSexMovs.com | TeenSexMania.com
Comment
-
Well we are talking about mass destruction here, that's what it would take. If they wanted to kill one important person, they can do it JFK style.Originally posted by StRoGE
Hundreds of thousands of truckloads to accomplish what?
They dont need to kill everyone in the US to do damage. Knock out ONE important person and you'll have chaos, which is really all they want to accomplish.
As much as people bash bush, could you imagine if he was killed by an isolated terrorist attack? It would be pure mayhem.Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos.
With TOP RATIO Sites like
ATMovs.com | iTeenVideo.com | TeenSexMovs.com | TeenSexMania.com
Comment
-
im not getting your arguement. if someone went on a subway and started a shooting spree, we shouldnt consider them a threat and go after them? if they killed a few cops, should we just leave it alone because their 1 life isnt worth risking more?Originally posted by VeriSexy
A little bit? You remember when that happened in Japan? It did squat compared to what happened on 911. Seriously, you can do allot more damage if they ran into a subway arming with guns and started shooting columbine style.
In order to do massive damage you would need a shitload of nerve gas in a pretty good condition. You need heavy concentration.
Just like the anthrax scares and how the media blow it out of proportion. How many people really died from it?333-765-551Comment
-
you act like "finding" a few shells justifies our occupation in iraq. nevermind the fact this all started in afghanistan in retaliation to 9/11 not as a full on offensive in iraqOriginally posted by bringer
haha, exactly my point. no matter what we uncover, it'll never be enough for all of you.
you're as much of an idiot as bush isOxeo - Serious Hosting For Serious Webmasters. iCQ:135.887013Comment
-
You keep quoting the subway, the problem with that attack was delivery, if they had aerosolized the sarin many, many more people would have been dead, instead they used sarin in plastic bags filled with air, they punctured. jeez.Originally posted by VeriSexy
A little bit? You remember when that happened in Japan? It did squat compared to what happened on 911. Seriously, you can do allot more damage if they ran into a subway arming with guns and started shooting columbine style.
In order to do massive damage you would need a shitload of nerve gas in a pretty good condition. You need heavy concentration.
Just like the anthrax scares and how the media blow it out of proportion. How many people really died from it?Comment
-
Everyone's a threat. Your mom's a fucking threat, you tool. Do you know how many countries are bigger, and thousands of times more powerful than itty bitty Iraq? Do some research before you spew your nonsense.Originally posted by StRoGE
How can you NOT think he was a threat to the US?
An IMMEDIATE threat, maybe not. Given enough time and resources he could have done some serious damage. He may not have been able to completely destroy the US, but he could have still done damage.
We're not concerned about anyone being a threat, obviously. And we're also not concerned about "liberating the people" because if we did we'd take out the Tutsis of Africa because the violence there is definitely worse than that of Iraq.
Ironically though, the Tutsis don't have oil.
Comment
-
what would you consider a proper amount to justify war? how many people should it be able to kill before the us takes action to protect us?Originally posted by XxXotic
you act like "finding" a few shells justifies our occupation in iraq. nevermind the fact this all started in afghanistan in retaliation to 9/11 not as a full on offensive in iraq
you're as much of an idiot as bush is333-765-551Comment
-
Remember though in Japan it was a weak strain of sarin in liquid form. The maker produced it quickly and the bags left on the train were only punctured allowing quick control. A more potent aerosol strain would be very different.Originally posted by VeriSexy
A little bit? You remember when that happened in Japan? It did squat compared to what happened on 911. Seriously, you can do allot more damage if they ran into a subway arming with guns and started shooting columbine style.
In order to do massive damage you would need a shitload of nerve gas in a pretty good condition. You need heavy concentration.
Just like the anthrax scares and how the media blow it out of proportion. How many people really died from it?
Regardless Saddam was probably making this shit to use on his own people. I doubt he was an immediate threat to the US with it.Living in Virtual Reality
Contact: Email (preferred): furiousmale .at. gmail - Skype: live:shanedwsComment
-
Only problem is Iraq never attacked AmericaOriginally posted by bringer
im not getting your arguement. if someone went on a subway and started a shooting spree, we shouldnt consider them a threat and go after them? if they killed a few cops, should we just leave it alone because their 1 life isnt worth risking more?
Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos.
With TOP RATIO Sites like
ATMovs.com | iTeenVideo.com | TeenSexMovs.com | TeenSexMania.com
Comment
-
i think maybe finding it the 1st year we were there would have been good, i also think had we found WMD before we actually captured the tyrannical leader in question that would have sufficed as well, but since it's what? now 6 months after we catch saddam and lost a thousand or so more troops, we've taken 2 steps back in reaching our goals set for iraq and we've had a civilian beheaded for the world to see.Originally posted by bringer
what would you consider a proper amount to justify war? how many people should it be able to kill before the us takes action to protect us?
I think it's a little late to justify ANYTHING in iraq, especially since we haven't accomplished the original goal of capturing OsamaLast edited by XxXotic; 05-17-2004, 09:01 AM.Oxeo - Serious Hosting For Serious Webmasters. iCQ:135.887013Comment
-
I really don't think it would take hundreds of thousands of tons of Sarin and Mustard gas 2 do a little damage.Originally posted by VeriSexy
You really believe Saddam would have smuggle hundreds of thousands of tons of Sarin and Mustard gas into the US by truck? LOL if he really wanted to and if it was that easy, then he could have done it 10 years ago
You crack me up
I swear some of you people, would take it out and play with it if you had one, a brain.Epic CashEpic Cash works for me
Solar Cash Paysite Plugin
Gallery of the day freesites,POTD,Gallery generator with free hostingComment
-
If the wind blew a different way that day in Japan it would of been far worse.Originally posted by Furious_Male
Remember though in Japan it was a weak strain of sarin in liquid form. The maker produced it quickly and the bags left on the train were only punctured allowing quick control. A more potent aerosol strain would be very different.
7Comment
-
Look at this violence. Look at this killing! Why aren't we here too??Originally posted by bringer
what would you consider a proper amount to justify war? how many people should it be able to kill before the us takes action to protect us?
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&lr...ab=wn&q=tutsisComment



Comment