Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Repetitive Monkey
Taken into consideration. At least for the URL list(s) this is an important feature. As for the referrer randomization you mentioned in the e-mail you wanted converted to a different system (if that e-mail was from you like I think), I am less inclined to agree. Because with the current system, you can do it both your desired way and the default way. Your way by simply setting Hits per URL to something higher than the number of Referrers. This will give statistical likelihood room to operate and give each of your referrers to each site. Another way is to do one run per Referrer.
|
Point #1 we agree on. Point #2 we now agree on because I understand why you did what you did. I also like the current method because there may be times when I want it to cycle through the list and not drop the same sites repeatedly on someone.
I was wondering though... will it cycle through the referrer list one at a time if I set it to less or would it reset back to referrer #1 each time the count reset to #1?