Penthouse: Billing Unit Under Anti-Trust Probe

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • trusted source
    Registered User
    • Mar 2004
    • 1

    #1

    Penthouse: Billing Unit Under Anti-Trust Probe

    6 May 2004
    13:53
    Dow Jones Corporate Filings Alert
    English
    (c) 2004 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.



    DJ CFA SOURCE: SEC 8-K

    REASON CODES:
    5--Other Materially Important Events


    WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--The Department of Justice is investigating a
    newly-acquired billing unit of Penthouse International Inc. (PHSLE) in an
    anti-trust probe, according to a Form 8-K that the company filed Thursday
    with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    As part of the investigation, Penthouse said Internet Billing Co. LLC
    must provide the department with information regarding certain one-time fees
    charged to merchants in 2003. The inquiry seeks to determine whether several
    Internet payment providers, including Internet Billing, collaborated to set
    those fees and if so, whether those practices are anti-competitive, according
    to the filing.

    As reported, Penthouse acquired Internet Billing in March from
    InterCept Inc. through its Media Billing LLC unit. The company said it
    learned of the investigation after closing the deal.

    Penthouse said it is responding to the Justice Department's requests
    and will continue cooperating with the inquiry.

    The company added that it is protected against certain actions taken
    by Internet Billing before the acquisition closed. But the company believes
    the potential damage claims could exceed the $3.8 million agreed upon in the
    purchase deal with InterCept, according to the filing.

    As a result, Penthouse said it will withhold payments to InterCept
    until the investigation is resolved or until InterCept posts "adequate"
    collateral to secure its protective obligations to the company.





    [ 05-06-04 1724ET ]





    DJ CFA SOURCE: SEC 8-K

    REASON CODES:
    5--Other Materially Important Events



    InterCept is also seeking $3.8 million in cash from the largest
    shareholder of Penthouse International as part of its sale in April of
    Internet Billing Co., according the filing.

    InterCept claims that Media Billing has defaulted on a $703,749, 8%
    note issued in connection with the purchase of Internet Billing, also known
    as iBill.

    Media Billing issued the note March 22 as part of its $10.25 million
    purchase of the iBill platform, according to the filing, along with $750,000
    in cash paid to InterCept and a further $2,804,000 in cash paid to First Data
    Merchant Services, a business partner of iBill.

    The filing also indicated that InterCept claims Media Billing failed
    to cause First Data to release a $3 million letter of credit backing the
    iBill purchase, and that Media Billing thus owes Intercept around $3.8
    million in cash under the terms of their March 16 purchase agreement.

    Media Billing's obligations under the purchase agreement, according
    to the filing, are guaranteed by Luis Enrique Fernando Molina G., the
    controlling shareholder of Penthouse International.

    The filing also indicated a potential issue with respect to the
    indemnification of Media Billing by InterCept against any pre-closing
    liabilities associated with the iBill sale.

    According to the filing, Intercept received notice on April 21 from a
    former client of iBill demanding payment related to a dispute over fines
    levied by Mastercard and passed onto iBill clients in 2003.

    The demand indicated the former client's intention "to file a lawsuit
    and seek class action status unless satisfactory payment arrangements can be
    made immediately," according to the filing.

    The damage claims in the demand were unspecified but indicate a
    potential value of "eight figures" according to the filing.
  • acratophorum
    Confirmed User
    • May 2004
    • 311

    #2
    Sweet sweet program...
    EARN up to 100% REV SHARE! Don't believe me? See sig!!!

    Comment

    • Fletch XXX
      GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
      • Jan 2002
      • 60840

      #3
      8 figures.


      Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

      Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

      Comment

      • torrey
        Confirmed User
        • Jan 2004
        • 1656

        #4
        "trustedsource"

        Comment

        • MichaelP
          Registered User
          • Aug 2003
          • 7123

          #5
          trusted source

          Registered: Mar 2004
          Location:
          Posts: 1

          Comment

          • Rich
            So Fucking Banned
            • Jan 2003
            • 11486

            #6
            Ibill was only worth 3.8 million?

            Comment

            • DR_PHIL
              Confirmed User
              • Oct 2002
              • 4099

              #7
              hmmmm

              Comment

              • Pornwolf
                Drunk and Unruly
                • Jan 2002
                • 22712

                #8
                Uh oh.
                I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade...

                Webair, bitches.

                Comment

                • MattO
                  The O is for Oohhh
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 10861

                  #9
                  Interesting...

                  Comment

                  • eroswebmaster
                    March 1st, 2003
                    • Jul 2001
                    • 20295

                    #10
                    Guccione 's world is falling apart.
                    For rent - ICQ 127-027-910
                    Click here for more details

                    Comment

                    • Shoplifter
                      Richest man in Babylon
                      • Jan 2002
                      • 5878

                      #11
                      Not good.

                      And it begs the question did all the IPSP's set the $750 registration fee arbitrarily and without any guidance from Visa?
                      I Like Blondes

                      Comment

                      • mailman24
                        Registered User
                        • Aug 2003
                        • 17

                        #12
                        bump

                        Comment

                        • skeet
                          Registered User
                          • Feb 2002
                          • 89

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Shoplifter
                          Not good.

                          And it begs the question did all the IPSP's set the $750 registration fee arbitrarily and without any guidance from Visa?

                          Visa said they wanted X and the IPSP charged Y. Y just happened to be more then X. The feds want to make sure its all on the up and up.

                          Comment

                          • tony299
                            lurker
                            • Aug 2002
                            • 57021

                            #14
                            wasnt part of it supposed to be some admin charge?

                            Comment

                            • Brujah
                              Beer Money Baron
                              • Jan 2001
                              • 22157

                              #15
                              As part of the investigation, Penthouse said Internet Billing Co. LLC must provide the department with information regarding certain one-time fees charged to merchants in 2003. The inquiry seeks to determine whether several Internet payment providers, including Internet Billing, collaborated to set those fees and if so, whether those practices are anti-competitive, according to the filing.
                              They would never collaborate to do that.

                              Comment

                              • skeet
                                Registered User
                                • Feb 2002
                                • 89

                                #16
                                Originally posted by tony404
                                wasnt part of it supposed to be some admin charge?
                                The admin charge was for the merchnat bank. FFB in a few of the cases.

                                I'm sure any other overages would be labeled a service charge

                                I don't see what the big deal is. Hey everyone has to make a buck right?

                                Even the two saloon owners talk to each other in Deadwood. This is not a case of price fixing IMO.

                                Comment

                                Working...