Originally posted by SomeCreep Yes, I've noticed TCG censors tours.
Have you noticed any difference in conversions with tours that are censored? Have conversions been noticeably better than those which are not censored?
All tours I've pushed have been censored, so I wouldn't really know.
http://www.darkcavern.com isn't censored yet and it converts EXTREMELY WELL on the same type of traffic as BoB.
Lensman, I asked your guys to send me an invoice for a May advertising package for the cavern and I even had a $300.00 contest to have the banner made, I never got the invoice.
You aren't censoring shit if you are promoting his reality sites. I sat in JB's office and listened to him tell me about not wanting to risk anything by showing penetration on the tours, then I launched a trailer with an Asian girl taking it in the ass.
Latona's - We Sell Money Making Web Properties
Note to buyers of websites and traffic: please check our inventory at http://latonas.com/websites-for-sale. If you would like to make an offer on something, just let me know.
You guys are talking about censoring a tour when the majority of affiliates are banging out 100's of Galleries that show full penetration and a whole lot more !! Surely the surfer (possibly under 18 !!) has "knocked one off" over one of your galleries, before they have even reached your site ?
When Paysites decide to drastically reduce the amount of free Hardcore Galleries that they offer to their affiliates etc.., then I feel the "legal" censorship of a Tour should be an issue.
Surely the same legal issues apply with a sites tour and their promotional material ?
Comment