Cybersocket Sues IBill for Nonpayment

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • just a punk
    So fuckin' bored
    • Jun 2003
    • 32393
    #1

    Cybersocket Sues IBill for Nonpayment

    WEST HOLLYWOOD, Calif. ? In an attempt to take a stand against ?what iBill has done? to the online community, Cybersocket co-owner Morgan Sommer has filed two legal claims against the third-party processor over nonpayment of advertising. Full story...

    First judicial precedent vs IBill???
    Obey the Cowgod
    Tags: None
    • BloodFart
      Confirmed User
      • Feb 2004
      • 728
      #2
      Im happy for you.
      Jesus = harry potter 2000 years ago.

        Comment

        • just a punk
          So fuckin' bored
          • Jun 2003
          • 32393
          #3
          Originally posted by BloodFart
          Im happy for you.
          Happy for me? Are you drunk dude?
          Obey the Cowgod

            Comment

            • Shoplifter
              Richest man in Babylon
              • Jan 2002
              • 5849
              #4
              It's a small claims action. Ibill won't show and they will win by default but they will have no chance of collecting anything.

              Or Ibill may just pay the bill, who knows.
              I Like Blondes

                Comment

                • just a punk
                  So fuckin' bored
                  • Jun 2003
                  • 32393
                  #5
                  However it is a first precedent as far as I know...
                  Obey the Cowgod

                    Comment

                    • Webby
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Oct 2002
                      • 14956
                      #6
                      Originally posted by cyberxxx
                      WEST HOLLYWOOD, Calif. ? In an attempt to take a stand against ?what iBill has done? to the online community, Cybersocket co-owner Morgan Sommer has filed two legal claims against the third-party processor over nonpayment of advertising. Full story...

                      First judicial precedent vs IBill???

                      Sure ain't the first - there have been a number of filings made since October 2004. I've not looked thru all of em (there are items not related to the current of iBill situation as well), but read enough to see a track record.

                      It is surprising that investors in PHSL/IBD/iBill are so interested in this stock. And also funny to see any "press statement" they issue is grasped and absorbed as being truth. PHSL are almost painting iBill as some rock solid biz

                      The underlying problem is PHSL - a defuct corp with great plans all over, including a Mexican resort complex. Then we have the famous "Doctor" Luis owning almost half of IBD. Sheesh, this is one incestuous operation!
                      XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                        Comment

                        • WiredGuy
                          Pounding Googlebot
                          • Aug 2002
                          • 34512
                          #7
                          The claims, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court?s Small Claims division, total $10,000 and are for back payment for two months of advertising.
                          This is just a non-payment for advertising, I'd be interested in seeing a suit filed for non-payment of their reserves/holdbacks.

                          WG
                          I play with Google.

                            Comment

                            • just a punk
                              So fuckin' bored
                              • Jun 2003
                              • 32393
                              #8
                              Originally posted by WiredGuy
                              I'd be interested in seeing a suit filed for non-payment of their reserves/holdbacks.
                              You you think there is any chance for that?
                              Obey the Cowgod

                                Comment

                                • Webby
                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                  • Oct 2002
                                  • 14956
                                  #9
                                  Originally posted by cyberxxx
                                  You you think there is any chance for that?
                                  Sure is, but some things may supercede that.

                                  Odd thoughts... iBill have breached any contract with their clients. There are no contracts.

                                  The exercise now is in debt recovery. That naturally would include *all* funds owning plus interest, and, depending whether ya get there quick enough, damages.

                                  Anything can happen now - including possible criminal action.
                                  Last edited by Webby; 02-02-2005, 02:30 PM.
                                  XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                    Comment

                                    • keyboard warrior
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Jul 2004
                                      • 1435
                                      #10
                                      http://www.ibillsux.com/postal/postal.htm

                                      "bump"
                                      - nothing here -

                                        Comment

                                        Previous template Next
                                        Working...