Originally posted by AlienQ No sah, thaz not what I am saying.
However...
Howard Stern is of an adult nature often enough and well supposedly this is an adult webmaster board comprised mostly of underage kids that call them selves adult webmasters.
And the occasional disrespectful child mentality power whores...
So to best closely relate Adult traffic comes to mind of course to spark some sorta relative comparison.
Sorry, but I think Stern's audience is much more diverse than you might think.
How you can compare sex.com's Alexa rating to Stern's is beyond me . . . however, while you keep saying Stern's Alexa rating is 17k, I see at at about half of that (8,675), and rising. It is readily apparent that their traffic has started screaming over the last couple of months.
That PR6 with 928 back links is pretty impressive too. I'd like to get a piece of his traffic for sure.
Originally posted by baddog Sorry, but I think Stern's audience is much more diverse than you might think.
How you can compare sex.com's Alexa rating to Stern's is beyond me . . . however, while you keep saying Stern's Alexa rating is 17k, I see at at about half of that (8,675), and rising. It is readily apparent that their traffic has started screaming over the last couple of months.
That PR6 with 928 back links is pretty impressive too. I'd like to get a piece of his traffic for sure.
Dont get me wrong man...
That was not what I was disputing bro.
Originally posted by SleazyDream no disrespect jim, i'm just looking at what i see and commenting
i'm not denying the total hits - bandwidth would confirm that. you have no reason to lie there. I believe that totally.
i'm just thinking your system either for counting uniques may be a little skewed or your system for counting total hits is actually counting image loads - an AVERAGE of 50 page views for surfer is enormous and unheard of- but if every image on the page is counted as a page load then a page with 20 images loaded 3 times would look like 50.
i have stats like that on my servers -it's counting every image a gallery loads as a page load cause a gallery has over 20 images on it. makes for enormous numbers but you need to find a stat that says html page loads for a more accurate number of real total hits.
Originally posted by SleazyDream not owned at all - jim is reading off the actualy stats from the site - onlyone owned here is you - and your own stupidity
Read the fucking thread man...
Ya should have cought up by now.
Originally posted by SleazyDream no disrespect jim, i'm just looking at what i see and commenting
i'm not denying the total hits - bandwidth would confirm that. you have no reason to lie there. I believe that totally.
i'm just thinking your system either for counting uniques may be a little skewed or your system for counting total hits is actually counting image loads - an AVERAGE of 50 page views for surfer is enormous and unheard of- but if every image on the page is counted as a page load then a page with 20 images loaded 3 times would look like 50.
i have stats like that on my servers -it's counting every image a gallery loads as a page load cause a gallery has over 20 images on it. makes for enormous numbers but you need to find a stat that says html page loads for a more accurate number of real total hits.
non taken...you are exactly correct....sounds and people playing around....thereis not one unique piece of content everthing takes you to a different website and you have to come back......Sleazy we have an etire tech staff...i was simply going off my intercomming back to get numbers mark and i and afew others have our guys in late tonight and the numbers are on...the system....you see some jerk wads.....as you know dont bother to ask the right questions.....
Mr. Alien smarty panrts guy
dude you call me a liar and i will do exactly what we have done have a 12 of coronas sent over and stand by to approve our presentation......all the while we are laughing at what a tool you looked like tonight......just sent the guys home.......and by al means alien hero.....pleasae call Yvonne to set up that meeting outr number is listed.
ok I'll take the hit from 600 to 500 but ass clown you take that is winning even if its just me....I will laugh at you in circles that you wish i wouldnt...period
Originally posted by SleazyDream no disrespect jim, i'm just looking at what i see and commenting
i'm not denying the total hits - bandwidth would confirm that. you have no reason to lie there. I believe that totally.
i'm just thinking your system either for counting uniques may be a little skewed or your system for counting total hits is actually counting image loads - an AVERAGE of 50 page views for surfer is enormous and unheard of- but if every image on the page is counted as a page load then a page with 20 images loaded 3 times would look like 50.
i have stats like that on my servers -it's counting every image a gallery loads as a page load cause a gallery has over 20 images on it. makes for enormous numbers but you need to find a stat that says html page loads for a more accurate number of real total hits.
I need to do shit clown....
i was off by 110k big fucking deal ......you still want to come down......if i had said 500 would you have said that sounds relistic...no you would not have so quit trying to look cool.....you opened yiour big fucking mouth and myself and other guys who now think you are a complete dork.....had a great time watching you try really hard to look smart......
ok I'll take the hit from 600 to 500 but ass clown you take that is winning even if its just me....I will laugh at you in circles that you wish i wouldnt...period
there's no need to take it from 600 to 500. a 600 k site will have VARIENCE. one day it'll show 650K - the next week 550K. winter higher than summer -and the like.
This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Looks like a nice business.
Though it does look like most other "Mainstream" design entities such as Organic for example your company has a great focus in Media.
Thanks for the discussion, if your serious about Next Monday I am good on that and will do.
Looks like a nice business.
Though it does look like most other "Mainstream" design entities such as Organic for example though your company has a great focus in Media which is really the future of the net.
Thanks for the discussion, if your serious about Next Monday I am good on that and will do.
Comment