50 pothead babies
Couple takes pictures of son, 2, smoking pot
Collapse
X
-
I saw an article the other day about some doctor giving her kids marijuana tea to treat ADD or something.
Here:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,117541,00.html
"Why would anyone want to give their child an expensive pill ? with unacceptable side effects, when he or she could just go into the backyard, pick a few leaves off a plant and make tea for him or her instead?" Jensen asked the Drug Policy Subcommittee of the House Government Reform Committee earlier this month.
A USC Med Professor of all things
more from the article:
She has also worked with one family of a 15-year-old ? whose family had tried every drug available to help their son, who by age 13 had become a problem student diagnosed as suffering from ADHD. Under Jensen?s supervision, he began marijuana treatment, settling on cannabis in food and candy form, and he has since found equilibrium and regularly attends school.Last edited by cherrylula; 04-27-2004, 04:27 PM.Comment
-
NOWHERE does it say the kid was actually smoking. There are only a few google news links even about this. Drudge picked it up before many others, and is making it out more than it is. And calls it "felony child abuse" instead of the ACTUAL charge
<a href=http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/KRS/530-00/064.PDF>unlawful transaction with a minor</a>
But the headlines are as follows. this is being blown out of proportion and is clearly a GAG picture and the cops cant prosecute it any other way.
<a href=http://www.14wfie.com/Global/story.asp?S=1820210>KY Couple Charged For Forcing Toddler To Smoke Pot</a>
Forced to smoke pot or GAG pic that we see EVERYDAY on the net?
<a href=http://www.lex18.com/Global/story.asp?S=1818190&nav=EQlpMcpO>Couple Arrested After Taking Pictures Of Child Smoking Pot</a>
only 3 google news resources on this news topic.
Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?
Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com -
recent work - About meComment
-
I would also have to assume that's not in the US =].Originally posted by reynold
Is he for real?!
A lot of time's story's and headlines are taken out of context. Almost every spamming case you see in the actual news says something like "SPAMMER TAKEN DOWN!" when in fact it was the credit card fraud and identity fraud he committed that got him in trouble/arrested. Ex: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/05...n_the_buffalo/
You can also look at a GREAT example of this through Paul Rueubens, a k a "Pee Wee Herman". He was arrested for possession of child pornography, but when you actually research the case almost everything taken as evidence was of "Questionable" children. Also was there no actual pornography persa. It was all of art, that when produced, was legal. The movie dragonfly and a CD by nirvana both depict a baby naked, but no one ever says anything about this. Paul had pictures of children nude, all which were artistically done, and the media goes crazy.
Personally I think it is sick for him to posses the pictures anyway, but of course the media never mentioned the already setup plans of him auctioning the art. Also the fact that his sentence included him registering as a sexual offender for only two years. Obviously the judge had to agree these were not pornographic since he already had a previous sexual offense against him and received no jail time and only two years registering.
Got to love the media =[
(i personally do not see any pics of a child naked as art, but who am I to judge other's? Last I checked, I wasn't God and I didn't have the right to tell others how to live their life.)Last edited by TGCashin; 04-27-2004, 05:03 PM.Comment
-
judging from your posts in this thread, I'd say you have a lot of growing up to do.Originally posted by TGCashin
I would also have to assume that's not in the US =].
A lot of time's story's and headlines are taken out of context. Almost every spamming case you see in the actual news says something like "SPAMMER TAKEN DOWN!" when in fact it was the credit card fraud and identity fraud he committed that got him in trouble/arrested. Ex: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/05...n_the_buffalo/
You can also look at a GREAT example of this through Paul Rueubens, a k a "Pee Wee Herman". He was arrested for possession of child pornography, but when you actually research the case almost everything taken as evidence was of "Questionable" children. Also was there no actual pornography persa. It was all of art, that when produced, was legal. The movie dragonfly and a CD by nirvana both depict a baby naked, but no one ever says anything about this. Paul had pictures of children nude, all which were artistically done, and the media goes crazy.
Personally I think it is sick for him to posses the pictures anyway, but of course the media never mentioned the already setup plans of him auctioning the art. Also the fact that his sentence included him registering as a sexual offender for only two years. Obviously the judge had to agree these were not pornographic since he already had a previous sexual offense against him and received no jail time and only two years registering.
Got to love the media =[
(i personally do not see any pics of a child naked as art, but who am I to judge other's? Last I checked, I wasn't God and I didn't have the right to tell others how to live their life.)SIG TOO BIGComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Do you really think a 2 year old would be able to inhale a pipe?
What were these people thinking?
Comment
-
they weren't thinking. That's the point. And that's why they deserve to lose their kids and do time.Originally posted by NBDesign
Do you really think a 2 year old would be able to inhale a pipe?
What were these people thinking?
SIG TOO BIGComment
-
-
Originally posted by Fletch XXX
I thought this was just "photoshop" work until I saw the second pic! Goodness!
Need Mainstream Content and SEO?
SEO * Website Copy * Blogs
Blogging - PR Work - Forum Marketing - Social Marketing - Link building - Articles
100% Guaranteed Content!
Comment
-
Now that would be a REAL police state.Originally posted by Fletch XXX
Which is clearly why I said, if parents DID care, they'd not be letting them read such things.
Parents allow magazines to teach their kids nowadays. Period, magazines, and TV.
I vote for mandatory license to breed.

Ouch.Comment
-
If you need a license to drive, you should need one to breed.Originally posted by Gman.357
Now that would be a REAL police state.

Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?
Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com -
recent work - About meComment
-
If you need a license to drive, you should need one to breed.Originally posted by Gman.357
Now that would be a REAL police state.

Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?
Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com -
recent work - About meComment
-
Dam tree huggers...Originally posted by Amputate Your Head
they weren't thinking. That's the point. And that's why they deserve to lose their kids and do time.
Didn't you ever hear of "let the one among you with no sin cast the first stone." Maby before you try and control other's lives because the few mistakes they have made you need to grow up and fix your own mistakes. Now if a child is getting beat, yes take the kids from him. If a person is making a GAG pictures, taking kids from his is blowing it out of the water!
Saying I need to grow up just proves how close minded people are. Because I support staying out of others business (unless it is truely necessary, where it is NOT here) I need to grow up? Atleast a few people support what I am saying here.Comment
-
ROFL.... i'm just about as far from being a tree-hugger as it gets.Originally posted by TGCashin
Dam tree huggers...
Didn't you ever hear of "let the one among you with no sin cast the first stone." Maby before you try and control other's lives because the few mistakes they have made you need to grow up and fix your own mistakes. Now if a child is getting beat, yes take the kids from him. If a person is making a GAG pictures, taking kids from his is blowing it out of the water!
Saying I need to grow up just proves how close minded people are. Because I support staying out of others business (unless it is truely necessary, where it is NOT here) I need to grow up? Atleast a few people support what I am saying here.SIG TOO BIGComment
-
Being it's an adult webmaster forum i would deff agree with that, but when you say someone should lose their kids for what was posted on here, thats just insain.Originally posted by Amputate Your Head
ROFL.... i'm just about as far from being a tree-hugger as it gets.Comment
-
huh?Originally posted by TGCashin
Being it's an adult webmaster forum i would deff agree with that, but when you say someone should lose their kids for what was posted on here, thats just insain.
I said nothing about 'losing kids over posting something'
I said if you're sticking a fucking pipe in your kids mouth and sparking it up, you deserve to GO TO JAIL.SIG TOO BIGComment
-
what ever you say. I'm just glad you weren't my mother/father =/.Comment
-
You're the one that needs to open your mind up. Your whole argument is based on your assumption that they were just taking gag pictures. Nowhere in that page does it say that the couple was just messing around. So if your sole assumption is wrong and they were in fact giving the kid pot to smoke, would your whole position be different?Originally posted by TGCashin
Dam tree huggers...
Didn't you ever hear of "let the one among you with no sin cast the first stone." Maby before you try and control other's lives because the few mistakes they have made you need to grow up and fix your own mistakes. Now if a child is getting beat, yes take the kids from him. If a person is making a GAG pictures, taking kids from his is blowing it out of the water!
Saying I need to grow up just proves how close minded people are. Because I support staying out of others business (unless it is truely necessary, where it is NOT here) I need to grow up? Atleast a few people support what I am saying here.Comment
-
Well I said many times that since they are 2, it is wrong. I never said it was right. I mearly said taking the kids away is wrong. As for gag or not, last time i checked a two year old couldn't inhail. I deff do think something should happen to the parents if it wasn't a gag, but not taken away. On top of all, taking kids away from their parent is one of the worst things you can do. You should only do that if it is needed, and in this case it wasn't.Originally posted by BigFish
You're the one that needs to open your mind up. Your whole argument is based on your assumption that they were just taking gag pictures. Nowhere in that page does it say that the couple was just messing around. So if your sole assumption is wrong and they were in fact giving the kid pot to smoke, would your whole position be different?Comment
-
What kind of parents does he have???Click Here to get $42 a sale AND Get FREE MGP Coaching from WebmasterLabor.Com
Sign up above then EMAIL info (( at )) webmasterlabor DOT com for your free 1 to 1 MGP coaching

Comment
-
LOL you 'all are messed up. LOL
LOL
If those pics arent redneck LOL I don't know what is. LOLComment
-
-
thats just wrong wasting weed on a 2 yr old
Need custom Tshirts? i provide quality shirts, screen printing, and personalized labels with your logo. For a catalog email me at: [email protected]Comment
-
you have got to be fucking kidding me..Originally posted by Fletch XXX
now THIS little fucker in INHALING!!!!
Comment
-
I wonder what they teach the kids down there at the age of 5?SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.Comment
-
shit like this is why people should be screened before breedingComment






Comment