Quote:
|
Originally Posted by reflected-dhb
There are not 2 companies doing business as reflected.net, I encourage you to read our other post. Is it a coincidence? Not at all. Companies buy each other all the time, you just have to draw a line in time between when reflected.net was in Vegas, and when it moved to Chicago.
Does the fact that we bought the name reflected.net mean that we are guilty of any spamming or sending emails with sexual content? No. Are we charged by the FTC, is our address listed, or our names mentioned? No. Please, take some time to educate yourself by reading the FTC's charges, or at least my other post where I explain what has happened.
We're working to have "WTFRC, Inc. D/B/A/ Reflected Networks, Inc." at least updated to "WTFRC, Inc. FORMERLY KNOWN AS Refleted Networks, Inc." on the FTC's charges, but whether or not they update it, it is NOT our company.
I reiterate myself - my partner and I are not mentioned, and have no direct involvement in the case.
|
I have read all the charges from the ftc site.
ANYONE would come to the conclusion its reflected.net . I appreciate your concern if your innocent , but dont blame me for stating the correlation , you should take that up with the ftc..
What your saying is shortly after phil *allegedly spammed reflected to death he sold it to you and now works for the same company he sold it too ? Confusing to say the least ??
http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL14923
spam complaint with your domains listed as recently as july ??
Im not saying YOUR guilty or even that PHIL is guilty im just saying its not as cut and clear as you make it sound.