View Single Post
Old 01-13-2005, 12:15 PM  
reflected-dhb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
http://www.spamhaus.org/rokso/eviden...kso_id=ROK4094

http://www.spamhaus.org/rokso/eviden...kso_id=ROK2235

Put that together with the YAHOO news stating reflected networks and phil together , then tell me anyone wouldn't put 2 + 2 together ??

Phil works for you and is charged by the ftc , but its just a coincidence that your also known as reflected ?

ANYONE is innocent until proven guilty , but looking out for your interests is just a no-brainer
There are not 2 companies doing business as reflected.net, I encourage you to read our other post. Is it a coincidence? Not at all. Companies buy each other all the time, you just have to draw a line in time between when reflected.net was in Vegas, and when it moved to Chicago.

Does the fact that we bought the name reflected.net mean that we are guilty of any spamming or sending emails with sexual content? No. Are we charged by the FTC, is our address listed, or our names mentioned? No. Please, take some time to educate yourself by reading the FTC's charges, or at least my other post where I explain what has happened.

We're working to have "WTFRC, Inc. D/B/A/ Reflected Networks, Inc." at least updated to "WTFRC, Inc. FORMERLY KNOWN AS Refleted Networks, Inc." on the FTC's charges, but whether or not they update it, it is NOT our company.

I reiterate myself - my partner and I are not mentioned, and have no direct involvement in the case.
reflected-dhb is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote