Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BradShaw
We have checks and balances in place to watch for affiliates abusing the software (shaving). I will not go into specifics.
99% of the big pps programs use their own code, it is almost impossible to run a large program with the constraints of compiled code. If you really think NATS is shave proof and you only want to send your traffic there, I am not going to argue with your short sidedness.
The average webmaster really does not understand shaving. It is an easy excuse for a shitty sales day. I am not saying people do not shave, look at Perfection Cash, they got caught red handed.
|
Okay..My short sidedness? I'm fully listening to everything you have to say...You provide at a higher cost the full source code...Which enables them to do whatever they want...From a programmers side of view...What capabilities does your "checks and balances" have when someone can modify anything in the scripts?
I am not really getting a solid answer on this...I would like to be able to trust sponsors using your system...But so far your not providing me with the hard standing that I can...So I will have to rely on using sponsors that have straight biller stats?
So your software is mainly just to provide affiliate programs with fraud protection...Nothing to protect webmasters from fraud? I figured with all these new fancy stats programs you would maybe look out for the industry as well?
Jon