FTC Rules All Pornographic 'Spam' Must Be Labeled

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PMGames
    Confirmed User
    • May 2003
    • 494

    #1

    FTC Rules All Pornographic 'Spam' Must Be Labeled

    Not sure if already posted, so here it is anyway...


    FTC Rules All Pornographic 'Spam' Must Be Labeled
    'SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT:' Labels Required Starting May 19

    WASHINGTON (April 13) - Pornographic ''spam'' e-mail will have to contain a warning on the subject line so Internet users can easily filter it out, the Federal Trade Commission said Tuesday.


    Starting May 19, sexually explicit e-mail will have to bear a label reading ''SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT:'' and the messages themselves will not be allowed to contain graphic material, the FTC said.

    Outrage over unsolicited pornography and other forms of junk e-mail spurred Congress to pass the first nationwide anti-spam law last year, which required the FTC to develop labels for smut.

    An FTC study released last spring found that 17 percent of pornographic offers contained images of nudity that appeared whether a recipient wanted to see them or not.

    The new rule is intended to change that. Pornographers will not be allowed to include sexually explicit pictures in the hahahaha of the message, though they will be allowed to include hyperlinks or other methods to access their material.


    Like other e-mail marketers, they will also have to include their postal address and an easy way for recipients to opt out of future mailings.

    The FTC proposed in January that pornographic messages be labeled ''SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT-CONTENT:'' but shortened the label in its final order to take up less space in the subject line.

    Marketers will not be allowed to use explicit phrases in the subject line, the FTC said.

    Several states have already passed laws requiring pornographic spam to bear an ''ADV:ADULT'' label or some variant, but they will be overridden by the federal standard.


    Reut12:28 04-13-04
    Paul M. Games
  • AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
    best designer on GFY
    • Mar 2003
    • 30307

    #2
    Over stepping there bounds, not enforceable, impediment tofree speech.

    Its gonna go to court.

    Comment

    • DR_PHIL
      Confirmed User
      • Oct 2002
      • 4099

      #3
      yep repost...such a waste of tax dollars

      Comment

      • PMGames
        Confirmed User
        • May 2003
        • 494

        #4
        oh..okay....looked two pages back but didn't see anything....man....is the search still off.

        here is the link to it on the forbes website to see it is legit:

        http://www.forbes.com/technology/new...tr1330562.html
        Paul M. Games

        Comment

        • warlock5
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2004
          • 2808

          #5
          They think all spam comes from the US?

          Comment

          • Heywood Jablome
            Confirmed User
            • Dec 2003
            • 869

            #6
            Originally posted by AlienQ
            Over stepping there bounds, not enforceable, impediment tofree speech.

            Its gonna go to court.
            Who is going to bring it to court?

            Comment

            • icedemon
              Confirmed User
              • Jun 2003
              • 1022

              #7
              Originally posted by warlock5
              They think all spam comes from the US?
              That's what I was thinking. Laws for the internet are pretty hard to enforce.
              Clips4Sale.com

              Comment

              • Odacova
                Registered User
                • May 2003
                • 9

                #8
                What a complete joke. First the "Can-Spam" bill, now this.

                Brilliant minds at work passing laws.
                <font size="1" face="verdana,ariel,arial,helvetica">
                My current no-bullshit, no-blind-links database project:<br></font><a href="http://www.joyoflinks.com"><img src="http://www.joyoflinks.com/images/joyoflinks_120x60.gif" width="120" height="60" border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4"></a>

                Comment

                • Doctor Dre
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Jan 2001
                  • 51692

                  #9
                  I actually think this is a good law and if ppl start to enforce it it will be great for our business ... Spam is just wrong . Spamming sex pics to kids with subject : Re: What's up is just totally wrong
                  Originally posted by rayadp05
                  I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?

                  Comment

                  • mardigras
                    Bon temps!
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 14194

                    #10
                    Why should the content of the e-mail be a concern if the subject is clearly labeled?

                    I like the earlier proposed protocol AD and ADLT in the subject line. Short sweet and easily filterable. Enforce that and the no fake return addy in the US then the only thing left to assure you get no porn in your kid's mailbox is to provide an option at the ISP level to block all non-pre-approved non-US addresses.

                    That protects kids but also lets those who want adult materials or solicitations receive them.
                    .

                    Comment

                    • PMGames
                      Confirmed User
                      • May 2003
                      • 494

                      #11
                      I think most of the big spammers are oversees these days anyway, so I doubt this will make any difference.
                      Paul M. Games

                      Comment

                      • EvaPharmacy
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jan 2004
                        • 255

                        #12
                        IMHO that those activities can only prevent US spammers from doing that...all other offshore mailers will continue their mailings without those rules.


                        Mailers I highly recommend you to work with OVERSEAS mail friendly sponsors ONLY!!

                        ICQ ME FOR DETAILS:
                        4705290

                        WE PAY YOU WEEKLY + NO REFUNDS FOR AFFILIATES + MAIL FRIENDLY HOSTING
                        SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

                        Comment

                        • spamofon
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jun 2003
                          • 2999

                          #13
                          YES I LIVE OUTSIDE USA, AND I WILL PUT "THIS EMAILS IS SPAM WITH PORN PLEASE FILTER IT OUT" TAG ON IT...............


































                          ......NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                          Comment

                          • Mishi
                            Confirmed User
                            • Feb 2002
                            • 1054

                            #14
                            Originally posted by spamofon
                            YES I LIVE OUTSIDE USA, AND I WILL PUT "THIS EMAILS IS SPAM WITH PORN PLEASE FILTER IT OUT" TAG ON IT...............

                            ......NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                            So you think people who actively filter unsolicited, adult-oriented emails are likely customers?
                            Looking for PHP/MySQL solutions? Check out Cyboriginal - custom scripts, installation services and more.

                            Comment

                            Working...