Land of the free !!!! LOL
Amazing how lingerie can be " offensive" but war is not.....
Indecency Uproar Taming U.S. Network TV
2 hours, 8 minutes ago Add Entertainment - Reuters to My Yahoo!
By Michele Gershberg
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Whether you believe it is a new sexual McCarthyism, or you see it as a long-awaited campaign against programing that's crossed the line into indecency, U.S. television is about to get toned down a notch.
Reuters Photo
Broadcasters may stage a retreat from edgy shows over the next few seasons as a regulatory campaign to clean up the airwaves gains surprising strength from election-year politics, media analysts said on Monday.
In a sign of what's to come, even underwear vendors are rethinking how they use sex to sell. Television network CBS confirmed on Monday that the much-hyped Victoria's Secret lingerie fashion show, an annual special, would not air this year.
Shari Anne Brill, director of programing at media buyer Carat USA, said racy programs have not lost their popularity, but networks are becoming more wary of being labeled indecent.
"There will be stricter self-regulatory guidelines because it seems that in this climate, everyone is afraid to cross the line," Brill said.
Provocative programs known to win ratings might receive a partial scrubbing to tone down storylines. Networks may be quicker to scrap weaker shows famed mainly for their shock value and scrutinize new scripts far more closely.
"This new hypersensitivity of the past year or so is changing the content of broadcasting," said Robert Thompson, professor of media and popular culture at Syracuse University. "Right now everyhahahaha is looking to take the heat off, turn the public attention down a few notches for a season or two."
Analysts said Victoria's Secret owner Limited Brands appeared keen to avoid negative publicity as Washington boosts indecency fines, especially since its last runway show drew lukewarm ratings and failed to push up sales.
Industry insiders largely declined to comment on the pressure an anti-indecency campaign could exert on their new program strategies.
But media watchers said the chilling effect of a Federal Communications Commission (news - web sites) crackdown -- which radio shock jock Howard Stern has likened to a "McCarthy-type witch hunt" -- is already creeping into programing plans.
It is a shift from the past five or six years, when broadcasters have sought to emulate daring and popular shows on cable television -- including HBO's Mafia crime series "The Sopranos" and sexual misadventure story "Sex and the City."
"They're going with a very homogenized, much more family-centric route, moving completely away from the edgy type of content," said media industry commentator Jack Myers. "The ability to take risks and break down established taboos is at an end for now."
Broadcast networks and the media conglomerates that own them -- including Viacom, Walt Disney Co. and News Corp., are loath to fight for foul language during a U.S. election year, especially as they seek regulatory concessions on other issues, including ownership laws, analysts said.
Public outrage against televised nudity and foul language mushroomed after singer Janet Jackson (news)'s breast was exposed during the Super Bowl telecast in February, adding fuel for raising FCC (news - web sites) fines on indecent material.
Some advertisers turned skittish even earlier as protests over perceived indecency gained ground ahead of the 2004 vote.
Youth retailer Abercrombie & Fitch pulled a catalog featuring scantily clad and naked models off store shelves, while automaker Chrysler cut a sponsorship of the "Lingerie Bowl" -- a televised game of tackle football between models in bras and panties.
Last week, broadcasters got a stronger taste of their vulnerability when the FCC proposed a $495,000 fine against Clear Channel Communications for comments by Howard Stern. Clear Channel had already dropped Stern. (Additional reporting by Jean Scheidnes)
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...g_indecency_dc
2 hours, 8 minutes ago Add Entertainment - Reuters to My Yahoo!
By Michele Gershberg
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Whether you believe it is a new sexual McCarthyism, or you see it as a long-awaited campaign against programing that's crossed the line into indecency, U.S. television is about to get toned down a notch.
Reuters Photo
Broadcasters may stage a retreat from edgy shows over the next few seasons as a regulatory campaign to clean up the airwaves gains surprising strength from election-year politics, media analysts said on Monday.
In a sign of what's to come, even underwear vendors are rethinking how they use sex to sell. Television network CBS confirmed on Monday that the much-hyped Victoria's Secret lingerie fashion show, an annual special, would not air this year.
Shari Anne Brill, director of programing at media buyer Carat USA, said racy programs have not lost their popularity, but networks are becoming more wary of being labeled indecent.
"There will be stricter self-regulatory guidelines because it seems that in this climate, everyone is afraid to cross the line," Brill said.
Provocative programs known to win ratings might receive a partial scrubbing to tone down storylines. Networks may be quicker to scrap weaker shows famed mainly for their shock value and scrutinize new scripts far more closely.
"This new hypersensitivity of the past year or so is changing the content of broadcasting," said Robert Thompson, professor of media and popular culture at Syracuse University. "Right now everyhahahaha is looking to take the heat off, turn the public attention down a few notches for a season or two."
Analysts said Victoria's Secret owner Limited Brands appeared keen to avoid negative publicity as Washington boosts indecency fines, especially since its last runway show drew lukewarm ratings and failed to push up sales.
Industry insiders largely declined to comment on the pressure an anti-indecency campaign could exert on their new program strategies.
But media watchers said the chilling effect of a Federal Communications Commission (news - web sites) crackdown -- which radio shock jock Howard Stern has likened to a "McCarthy-type witch hunt" -- is already creeping into programing plans.
It is a shift from the past five or six years, when broadcasters have sought to emulate daring and popular shows on cable television -- including HBO's Mafia crime series "The Sopranos" and sexual misadventure story "Sex and the City."
"They're going with a very homogenized, much more family-centric route, moving completely away from the edgy type of content," said media industry commentator Jack Myers. "The ability to take risks and break down established taboos is at an end for now."
Broadcast networks and the media conglomerates that own them -- including Viacom, Walt Disney Co. and News Corp., are loath to fight for foul language during a U.S. election year, especially as they seek regulatory concessions on other issues, including ownership laws, analysts said.
Public outrage against televised nudity and foul language mushroomed after singer Janet Jackson (news)'s breast was exposed during the Super Bowl telecast in February, adding fuel for raising FCC (news - web sites) fines on indecent material.
Some advertisers turned skittish even earlier as protests over perceived indecency gained ground ahead of the 2004 vote.
Youth retailer Abercrombie & Fitch pulled a catalog featuring scantily clad and naked models off store shelves, while automaker Chrysler cut a sponsorship of the "Lingerie Bowl" -- a televised game of tackle football between models in bras and panties.
Last week, broadcasters got a stronger taste of their vulnerability when the FCC proposed a $495,000 fine against Clear Channel Communications for comments by Howard Stern. Clear Channel had already dropped Stern. (Additional reporting by Jean Scheidnes)
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...g_indecency_dc
Comment