John,
We don't have to sale our software for a 1.00 or a 1000.00 to anyone on this board. If you had read the post you would have seen why I was doing it. We have bigger fish to fry that you.
My whole post was to point out just how you have been touting nats as being shave proof.
If others want to use your software because of false advertising you feeding them, we have no problem with that. This thread by Lee was to point out that you can shave with nats, and easily at that. His not the only one saying this. I'm not going to go back through this thread and count all the other people that has pointed out what you have obviously been telling everyone. Which is lies.
I've already spent too much time on this and need to get back to work.
Before you go, you never did reply directly to my post other than:
Just deciphered more of your post. Seems you're offering to "discount people" who are considering NATS. Pretty desperate.
Perhaps you're only pissed we just moved someone off your system to ours and not vice-versa.
Let me pull out the part I like most and could you comment as to why Fabian would make such a statement like this if you hadn't been advertising your solution as shave proof?
BEGIN THREAD:
angeleyes: It's not possible to shave with NATS and the owners, no matter how much money offered will not build in that feature either. I have first hand knowledge of this.
makefuckingmoney: I believe the NATS guy admitted it was possible to shave them.
So to say its not shaveable is misleading
fthylmann: Where did I admit its possible to shave? You pointed out multiple ways you think its possible to "shave" by handling the postback, and I told you why every single one of them is not an effective way to do it out of various reasons.
Fabian Thylmann
Too Much Media LLC
NATS - Next-generation Administration & Tracking Software
makefuckingmoney: my point is that it IS shaveable..while it doesnt have built in shave functions, any programmer could filter the postback VERY easily.
and thats a fact jack!
fthylmann: Do you even listen?
Filtering the postback _DOES NOT HELP_ It would just DELAY us getting the data. We would get the sale info and import it between 15 minutes and 24 hours later, depending on the biller and the time of day.
Blocking postback data does NOT HELP.
I have enough of this constant back and forth, if you do not read what I write, so be it. There is no way to shave in NATS and noone has given us any explanation or description of how he would add shaving externally which WORKS. Now THAT is a fact. If anyone can think of a way to do shaving, feel free to suggest it, and I will tell you why it does not work, just like I told MFM 3 times now (even if he does not listen).
I have said multiple times, and I will say so again, we have MANY systems in place in NATS to prevent shaving. And we will be adding new ones when we ourself (or others) figure out ways to circumvent any. We have not yet found any ways to do so.
Enough about this...
__________________
--
Fabian Thylmann
Too Much Media LLC
NATS - Next-generation Administration & Tracking Software
END THREAD.
I hope you can read it a little better now. Now you might be able to explain it.
Your going to sit there and say that you or others (we) have never said you couldn't shave with nats
You should go on the road
Again if we were desperate we would be in banging heads with you everyday. We are not going to do that because
1. We don't need too.
2. We will not stoop as you low as you have stooped in promoting your product. Period.
Remember this, what comes around goes around my friend and you'll get yours one day.
I'm outta here for probably another 4 months.
To all the other GFY's I haven't seen and talked to.
Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.