New version of GFY coming soon... what features would you like to see?

**Thong Sniper** · 04-09-2004, 11:58 AM

I'd like to see one of my banners in the rotation.

**riosluts** · 04-09-2004, 11:59 AM

is there really a new version coming soon or r u just suggesting it

**buddyjuf** · 04-09-2004, 11:59 AM

Id like to see a STABLE version of the board as well as the search function

**~Ray** · 04-09-2004, 12:00 PM

search funtion

**Heywood Jablome** · 04-09-2004, 12:02 PM

Ban sigs, or maybe limit them to one line of text

**aaron** · 04-09-2004, 12:03 PM

SEARCH GOD DAMNIT

**aaron** · 04-09-2004, 12:03 PM

k now that i actually read your post i agree, PM's would also be really nice.

**Juicy D. Links** · 04-09-2004, 12:05 PM

troll filter

**polish_aristocrat** · 04-09-2004, 12:05 PM

Originally posted by riosluts
is there really a new version coming soon or r u just suggesting it

Yes, Lensman said it two days ago.

Search function seems to be obvious, but maybe some new features, options, rules etc, by the way.

**Spunky** · 04-09-2004, 12:05 PM

Originally posted by Heywood Jablome
Ban sigs, or maybe limit them to one line of text

No they want to attract sponsors ,not turn them away

**SilverTab** · 04-09-2004, 12:06 PM

I'll have to go with a search button too...

**doober** · 04-09-2004, 12:07 PM

Originally posted by bdjuf
Id like to see a STABLE version of the board as well as the search function

Amen

**DR_PHIL** · 04-09-2004, 12:08 PM

search!

**aaron** · 04-09-2004, 12:09 PM

QUICK REPLY

**sexualdiva** · 04-09-2004, 12:09 PM

PM's or instant message capabilities, chatrooms,Search function,and picture options with screename.
My two cents..

**Bassab** · 04-09-2004, 12:12 PM

I'd like to see an option which tells you if the user is online or offline.. (like on the bottom of every reply and shit..)

If seen that on several other boards and I think it'll be a great plus for this board.

**polish_aristocrat** · 04-09-2004, 01:24 PM

Originally posted by sexualdiva
PM's or instant message capabilities, chatrooms,Search function,and picture options with screename.
My two cents..

chatrooms?

**Thong Sniper** · 04-09-2004, 01:26 PM

Originally posted by aaron
QUICK REPLY

no shit. I will personally hack this in for them if they dont want to do it.

also. how about a 70 width for text boxes for non ie browsers. thanks

**Kard63** · 04-09-2004, 01:36 PM

1. search
2. PM's
3. avatars
4. links to contacts like aim listed on posts
5. quit reply
6. invision boards

7. remove the "new topic" button from the area when you reading a post, jsut have it at the forum.

**Herb Kornfield** · 04-09-2004, 01:40 PM

1. Search enabled.
2. Who's online / offline
3. Private Messaging.

**TheFrog** · 04-09-2004, 01:44 PM

Originally posted by spunky1

No they want to attract sponsors ,not turn them away

i agree, sigs are useful for promotion

**Mefo** · 04-09-2004, 01:48 PM

Originally posted by aaron
QUICK REPLY

hell yeah, imagine how fast threads would go with this

**Mefo** · 04-09-2004, 01:50 PM

Originally posted by Herb Kornfield

2. Who's online / offline

are you nuts? imagine how huge this list would be at some times...

**gornyhuy** · 04-09-2004, 01:53 PM

-more smileys
-image-text verification on search so there is no limit to search frequency/timing and no potential for hacking or dos
-having flash enabled would be nice, but i guess its insecure.
-enhanced search, this one is pretty clunky
-some way to mark threads and put in your watch list or favorites list rather than having to search to keep up with things
-private messaging

**Raf1** · 04-09-2004, 01:53 PM

I'd be happy with just the search and PM function enabled...

**tranza** · 04-09-2004, 02:04 PM

I'd be happy with the search option back and quick replies...

**polish_aristocrat** · 04-10-2004, 03:48 AM

Yeah, more smileys would be cool too

**FreeOnes** · 04-10-2004, 05:03 AM

SEARCH

**High Quality** · 04-10-2004, 05:10 AM

You'll never see it. More profit for lens by disabling PM.

If you have to start a new thread thats more views, etc.

**NiTe-HaWk** · 04-10-2004, 05:11 AM

search, quick reply, and pm

**brickbat** · 04-10-2004, 05:12 AM

How soon is 'soon'?

**alexg** · 04-10-2004, 05:12 AM

a search function that works all the time...
a store for points would be cool too

**Corleone** · 04-10-2004, 05:19 AM

hmm pm is fine..
but i think some members here would be bombed with "please list my gallery" pms ;)

**Frank The Tank** · 04-10-2004, 05:28 AM

Quick reply
calendar - people can add product launchs or when webmaster events are on
avatars

IF private messages are brought in i would suggest a restriction on the use of it be brought in with it - IE - restrict permission of usage of private messages to members with a certain post count only .. ie - 1000 or 2000 this would prevent mis use of it from spammers

**teomaxxx** · 04-10-2004, 05:32 AM

Originally posted by juicylinks
troll filter

troll filter for all idiot and sigwhoring posts on GFY

**polish_aristocrat** · 04-10-2004, 07:43 AM

Yeah, and we should be able to edit our posts for longer than 1 fucking minute

**KRL** · 04-10-2004, 07:47 AM

Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
Yeah, and we should be able to edit our posts for longer than 1 fucking minute

Yes!! I type fast and make spelling mistakes as do many people here and it sucks you can't go back and fix them.

I'd also like to see stats on our posts. Top posters and total views built in.

**polish_aristocrat** · 04-12-2004, 03:04 AM

bump for Lensman ( ? )

**Gemini** · 04-12-2004, 03:21 AM

I'm with you KRL! Speed = typos and then you're lucky to get to edit one in 20. Even when I use the dsl, I raarely get time to edit... the board seems to be running slower each day.

Best feature to add in?! AUTO BAN when someone whines about the search feature!! lol Use Google Advanced and get better AND faster results and quit crying.

**doornx** · 04-12-2004, 03:52 AM

Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
Personally, I'd like to see private messages enabled in the new version.
Let's say I want to get in touch with another webmaster and a PM would be the easiest way.
Not everyone has ICQ in profile, so when I want to get in touch with someone, then I have to start a thread "webmaster X, please contact me", or "who's got the icq of webmaster X". Then this thread either get's lost in 2 hours, or I or somenoe else bumps it, but then it only causes that more unimportant threads are in the main forum.
PM's would solve this problem.
Surely, there must be a way to eliminate spammers, so either those who would spam others on PM's would get automatically banned, or poeple would have the opion to accept PM's only from people from their "buddy lists"...

i totally agree, pm's would be great! had it a few times before i couldn't contact a certain webmaster

**goBigtime** · 04-12-2004, 04:02 AM

Originally posted by Thong Sniper

also. how about a 70 width for text boxes for non ie browsers. thanks

What he said.

**polish_aristocrat** · 04-12-2004, 05:36 AM

To be honest, I doubt that the features that had been listed in this thread, will be implemented.

But at least the search is working now...

**mardigras** · 04-12-2004, 06:10 AM

Originally posted by Gemini
lol Use Google Advanced and get better AND faster results and quit crying.

Does Google give you a list of all threads you have posted in with a quick 1-glance to see which ones have been replied to? Clicking each old thread to see (even if bookmarked) takes a LOT of time that could be spent reading other threads on this fast moving board.

**zentz** · 04-20-2004, 04:39 AM

yeap pm would be nice

New version of GFY coming soon... what features would you like to see?

New version of GFY coming soon... what features would you like to see?

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment