|
Lee, I read over this briefly. You seem to keep harping on the same point, you act totally unprofessional, and I have absolutely zero respect for you at this point. This is the last time in my life I will converse with you.
You said on page 5 all you wanted to hear was that it is not _impossible_ to shave with NATS. I said that in my 2nd post on page one, but you continued to ask it a few dozen times again anyway. You are reptative, apparently not very smart, and now seemingly here just to annoy myself and Fabian.
We have better things to do than argue on GFY about the same thing over and over and over again when we have answered your question and stated our views and standing.
Again, for the record...
The affiliate program owner can always do things to screw with the program. NATS has ever said or guaranteed anything to the contrary. NATS has built our system to not include a shave feature and to make it as hard as we know how to detect a program owner trying to play with the numbers. Should we detect a program trying to play with the numbers we will find out why. If it's to steal from an affiliate, their liscense will be revoked and they will find themselves with a lawsuit. We have built checks and balances in to keep an eye on shaving activities. If we sit here and tell you what they all are, that would simply make it that much easier to make sure the flags do not go off.
You obviously have some sort of problem with myself or my company as you see the need to constantly go in circles even though I said what you claim you wanted to hear on page one in my first detailed reply. I'm really getting the feeling you're nothing but a GFY troll in need of attention and a nobody in this business. Those who posted in this thread on your character seeem to feel the same way.
Again, this will be my last reply to you and my last conversation with you. Goodbye.
|