Quote:
Originally posted by Johny Traffic
Got a simple question:
Do you think an program owner wants to RISK someone seeing something this obvious? Even if its unlikely to happen? = No I dont think they would want to risk that
Or do you think a program owner would rather just shave in a way noone can notice it? = I think they would rather
There is a simple different in our understanding of what we claim.
The one thing we all agree on I think is that NATS can not shave. = agreed
The thing we seem to keep missing eachother on is, that yes anyone can shave by adding obvious and detectable things to their paysite tours, BUT NATS makes it extra complicated to even do that AND that if anyone is found to DO that we WILL remove their license, they lose the one thing they can make money with. = never disagreed at any point with that
I dont disagree with what you say Just pointing out the obvious and playing devils advocate
|
Then we all agree.. and I noticed that you are playing devils advocate, and do not mind it at all.
These kinds of threads are actually welcomed by myself as long as people stick to the facts because sometimes people come up with ideas of what to do which we did not think of yet, which lets us add more protection against it in NATS.