|
Donovan, Gary exact actions in blocking you from ASACP is only a side part of the issue. If i go to sex.com and serch for "TEEN KARMA" or "TEENKARMA" I get the default search page (with napster of porn and others). I search for lightspeed, and I get ONLY the link to ASACP. Obviously, while Gary feels (in your words) that Teen Karma is a bad site, he still doesn't actively filter the term like he filters out the Lightspeed stuff.
That isn't consistancy, that is done with intent. What image it leaves the public with is fairly obvous.
the ASACP situation is just as bad: If all your models are 18, if your paperwork is in line, and you are legal, then they should have no issue with you. By having the organization that supposedly represents the online industry refuse you membership because they question your content could lead to the government making the same assumption. In a very real way, they have basically said "we are not sure about this donovan guy", because if they were sure, they would allow you to be a member and to support the cause.
Using subjective rather than objective rules to approve or disapprove membership to what should be one of the most important organizations in the business is, IMHO, a flawed way of selecting those that are worthy.
I hope that Joan now takes the time to look at the situation that has been created, and move to a more subjective approach so that membership in this organization can be encouraged, not discouraged.
Alex
|