720 X 480 Resolution hosted movie galleries.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BV
    wtf
    • Sep 2001
    • 10914

    #1

    720 X 480 Resolution hosted movie galleries.

    720 X 480 Resolution hosted movie galleries.

    Do you think it would be worth a shot?

    Show the surfer what he'll get?


    Discuss.....
  • Mr Pheer
    So Fucking Banned
    • Dec 2002
    • 22083

    #2
    Do 600 x 338 and have it in 16:9 Movie Screen format

    Comment

    • Major (Tom)
      So Fucking Banned
      • Nov 2003
      • 32492

      #3
      thats too big.
      640x480 dvd res is fine. You will get big file sizes and i doubt it will increase conversions but it will increse BW.
      Duke

      Comment

      • UniversalPass Pete
        Confirmed User
        • Dec 2004
        • 7368

        #4
        Originally posted by DukeSkywalker
        thats too big.
        640x480 dvd res is fine. You will get big file sizes and i doubt it will increase conversions but it will increse BW.
        Duke

        He's right!


        V4.0 It's Here! NOT JUST AVS ANYMORE!

        Teen Whore Fetish All Milf Sluts Real Asian Cunts All Latina Cunts Massive XXX Boobs All Out Anal

        Since 1997. ICQ: 107746038

        Comment

        • seven
          Confirmed User
          • Apr 2002
          • 2697

          #5
          Originally posted by DukeSkywalker
          thats too big.
          640x480 dvd res is fine. You will get big file sizes and i doubt it will increase conversions but it will increse BW.
          Duke
          tried that already doesn't increase conversion thou if you use wmv format bandwith may not increase but conversion may drop a bit since all surfers may not have the right wmv codec.
          Toy Rev
          Rouge Web Design

          Comment

          • iwantchixx
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Oct 2002
            • 12860

            #6
            I'd love to see the bandwidth bill on that

            Comment

            • boner 2.0
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Jul 2004
              • 10970

              #7
              Originally posted by seven
              tried that already doesn't increase conversion thou if you use wmv format bandwith may not increase but conversion may drop a bit since all surfers may not have the right wmv codec.
              Not only they may not have the wmv codec, but keep in mind there is more Linux/*BSD users out there, Yes you can watch wmv on linux (dunno about bsd never tried ) but it sucks, slow and ugly washed colors, etc. Mpeg is fine, Divx work well too

              Comment

              • Tat2Jr
                Confirmed User
                • Feb 2001
                • 4882

                #8
                Um, 720x480 isn't the right aspect ratio. It comes off the DV camera onto a computer like that because it's expecting to be played on a TV screen which has different shaped pixels then a PC monitor making it 640x480 aspect ratio when viewed on a television. If it's gonna be viewed on a computer you want to make it 640x480 or 320x240 or something in the correct aspect ratio. Haven't you noticed that everything is streched sideways on the native 720x480?
                NICHE MONEY >> Ass WorshipPantiesSolo TeenPantyhose
                Serving up exclusive fetish sites since 1997!

                Comment

                • MattO
                  The O is for Oohhh
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 10861

                  #9
                  Only South Korea has the bandwidth per capita to handle the huge broadband aspect of the big rez but get ahead of the West and take care of biz

                  Comment

                  • seven
                    Confirmed User
                    • Apr 2002
                    • 2697

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Tat2Jr
                    Haven't you noticed that everything is streched sideways
                    That's called wide screen tv? I'm used to a 58" wide screen in my living room so 640x480 doesn't look right to me neither does 320x240 i prefer 352x240 or 720x480 besides, you logic for 640x480 or 320x240 sounds kinda shaky to me
                    Toy Rev
                    Rouge Web Design

                    Comment

                    • MattO
                      The O is for Oohhh
                      • Feb 2003
                      • 10861

                      #11
                      I got a goolephonic stereo with a moon rock needle and it sounds like shit.

                      Comment

                      • BV
                        wtf
                        • Sep 2001
                        • 10914

                        #12
                        I don't really care about the etra B/W as long as the sales are there. We're only talking twice the file size anyways. The reason I said 720 x 480 is that's what is available inside my members area. (along with 160x120 & 360x240)

                        I just think the wow effect of a larger & clearer picture would be a great selling point.



                        and Mr Pheer, the 16:9 would be cool! Maybe I'll start shooting in 16:9 wide screen format. The Sony VX will do that but I have never tryed it.

                        Comment

                        Working...