GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

garry · 12-07-2004, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PBucksJohn
This is a copy of my reply to your (same) post in the other thread:

We have not bashed your company. We have only pointed out things that are fact when they come up on the boards. You are the ones who built a theft feature into your software, not us.

We do not solict your customers, they come to us. They do so becuase your software was having performance issues. Or having support issues. Or having issues with all of the data not making it in to the system.

We have moved a number of people from both MPA2 and 3 to NATS. I am not aware of one customer ever leaving NATS yet for any software. Yours or not.

MPA2 may have been around longer than NATS, but that doesn't mean much. Both myself and my partners have been in the online adult business since 1996. One of my partner has been in the adult business for over 25 years. We're not the new kids no the block.

We are never looking to bash your company we are only looking to offer people a better solution. We never paint you in an untrue light. We have NEVER made things up about your company or mislead people like Oystein did when he claimed to a potential client we had "hidden fees". This is bad business. What we do is point the truth. I don't expect good business tho from someone who builds fraud features into affiliate software. It's to be expected I guess.

I don't know what you mean by mpa2/3 making the program owner more money. I'd really like to know how you claim this? I hope it's not a reference to the shave feature which you seem to think is the fault of the affiliate not the fault of the program owner or yourself for building it into the software.

There is a reason the biggest companies in adult choose NATS and not Mansion. It's called integrity.

You guys use every opertunity you have to bash our company. You do not need to be much on GFY to see the way you guys do business. But this is your choose and not mine.

And you have and are calling up our customers. I have clients comming to me telling them about the phone calls they get from you guys. I didnt belive it the first time I heard it, but when it was several of them saying the same thing then I didnt have any other choose.

And yes, both me and oystein have been in this business since 1996 as well. So the point of your statement is ? What I was talking about was the experience we had when it came to building and manage an script like this.

By stating that the mpa3 program makes the webmasters more money we mean that we have real cascading, that works like a real cascading software should do. In other words, the clients dont have to fill out all the info several times if their CC is declined.

And please about the biggest programs using nats and not mpa3. Now that is rubbish and you know it!