|
This is a copy of my reply to your (same) post in the other thread:
We have not bashed your company. We have only pointed out things that are fact when they come up on the boards. You are the ones who built a theft feature into your software, not us.
We do not solict your customers, they come to us. They do so becuase your software was having performance issues. Or having support issues. Or having issues with all of the data not making it in to the system.
We have moved a number of people from both MPA2 and 3 to NATS. I am not aware of one customer ever leaving NATS yet for any software. Yours or not.
MPA2 may have been around longer than NATS, but that doesn't mean much. Both myself and my partners have been in the online adult business since 1996. One of my partner has been in the adult business for over 25 years. We're not the new kids no the block.
We are never looking to bash your company we are only looking to offer people a better solution. We never paint you in an untrue light. We have NEVER made things up about your company or mislead people like Oystein did when he claimed to a potential client we had "hidden fees". This is bad business. What we do is point the truth. I don't expect good business tho from someone who builds fraud features into affiliate software. It's to be expected I guess.
I don't know what you mean by mpa2/3 making the program owner more money. I'd really like to know how you claim this? I hope it's not a reference to the shave feature which you seem to think is the fault of the affiliate not the fault of the program owner or yourself for building it into the software.
There is a reason the biggest companies in adult choose NATS and not Mansion. It's called integrity.
|