huge pics vs. video (*huge* pics) - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

fktup

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2003

Posts: 238
Share

Post
#1

huge pics vs. video (*huge* pics)

12-06-2004, 07:22 AM

Do surfers appreciate huge high-res pictures as much as video? Probably not, but how do they convert?

Gallery for surfers

Another gallery (not as cute though):
Gallery for surfers

What's your experience promoting Image based sites?

pornofish adult site reviews
Tags: None
NinjaSteve

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Dec 2003

Posts: 11089
Share

Post
#2

12-06-2004, 07:56 AM

A majority of the old school surfers (what is that, maybe 40%) have 800x600 res. With windowsXP it forces a higher res desktop. So I think that bigger pictures could do better now and in the future. I prefer images that can fit on a 1024x768 screen so that they're bigger than other galleries, fit the screen of the newer PCs with the default rez, and aren't too huge for 800x600.

If a person has 800x600 res, they probably won't know how to view the picture at a smaller size if they have their picture resizing tool turned off in IE.

...
Comment
fktup

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2003

Posts: 238
Share

Post
#3

12-06-2004, 01:32 PM

How about promoting sites that focus on high quality photo content?

I've done OK with some , but others haven't gone anywhere.

I agree it's probably 'older' surfers who appreciate good photos. How do you target the 'collector' types?

pornofish adult site reviews
Comment
MandyBlake

The one and only!

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 17761
Share

Post
#4

12-06-2004, 02:46 PM

I don't like huge pictures.
I keep the pictures in my members section around 700pixels on the long side.
I have had no complaints. But Tony also frames everything very tightly so that whole picture is just me...not a bunch of shitty background objects.
Also...only 20% of people who have internet access have high speed, so why have the dial up users suffer?

Mandy's Playhouse
Her First Fat Girl
If you're interested in promoting my sites, ICQ me! 178411921
Comment
qweasd

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 227
Share

Post
#5

12-07-2004, 04:49 AM

I like very hq pics! they rock!

SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
Comment
Fukeneh

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2004

Posts: 1245
Share

Post
#6

12-07-2004, 05:51 AM

Originally posted by MandyBlake
I don't like huge pictures.
I keep the pictures in my members section around 700pixels on the long side.
I have had no complaints. But Tony also frames everything very tightly so that whole picture is just me...not a bunch of shitty background objects.
Also...only 20% of people who have internet access have high speed, so why have the dial up users suffer?

20% sounds a bit off to me. i think its more like 40% now.
Comment
PrivateIvy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 4257
Share

Post
#7

12-07-2004, 05:58 AM

Originally posted by Fukeneh
20% sounds a bit off to me. i think its more like 40% now.

My server stats still show much lower than 40% as well as about the same viewing at 800x600

Ivy
Comment
jimmyf

OU812

Join Date: Feb 2001

Posts: 12651
Share

Post
#8

12-07-2004, 06:00 AM

Originally posted by PrivateIvy
My server stats still show much lower than 40% as well as about the same viewing at 800x600

Ivy

yep

Epic CashEpic Cash works for me
Solar Cash Paysite Plugin
Gallery of the day freesites,POTD,Gallery generator with free hosting
Comment
MandyBlake

The one and only!

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 17761
Share

Post
#9

12-07-2004, 06:21 AM

Originally posted by Fukeneh
20% sounds a bit off to me. i think its more like 40% now.

That's what I had figured too.
But yesterday while driving to work, I was listening to the radio and CNN radio came on and gave that factoid. I was shocked it was that low.

Mandy's Playhouse
Her First Fat Girl
If you're interested in promoting my sites, ICQ me! 178411921
Comment
MandyBlake

The one and only!

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 17761
Share

Post
#10

12-07-2004, 06:24 AM

Originally posted by PrivateIvy
My server stats still show much lower than 40% as well as about the same viewing at 800x600

Ivy

I'll have to check my stats out once I get to the office today and report them here as far as that goes.

Mandy's Playhouse
Her First Fat Girl
If you're interested in promoting my sites, ICQ me! 178411921
Comment
tranza

ICQ: 197-556-237

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 57559
Share

Post
#11

12-07-2004, 06:30 AM

I don't think that that will convert better...

I'm just a newbie.
Comment
Jake

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2001

Posts: 3056
Share

Post
#12

12-07-2004, 07:20 AM

If you can't see face, tits and pussy without scrolling then it's too big! Assume user screen rez is set no higher than 1024x768.
Comment
fktup

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2003

Posts: 238
Share

Post
#13

12-07-2004, 07:23 AM

I was more relating huge image content to video content, so bandwidth isn't really the deciding issue is it?

If you've got the bandwidth to be watching video, you should be fine with images - no matter how big.

I'm talking more about surfer appreciation. Do people appreciate hi-rez, hi-quality photo content?

I know some people do well with sites like MetArt & Hegre.

pornofish adult site reviews
Comment
martin_simpletraffic

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2004

Posts: 216
Share

Post
#14

12-07-2004, 07:26 AM

When I first started to see porn i was always looking for the bigger pictures and assume those were better...time went by and i still feel the same way..LOL

[email protected]

This is as simple as it gets!!!

30+ products to promote....All webmasters accepted....All traffic accepted....Downloadable executables....and much more!!!
Comment
r3ap3r

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 3535
Share

Post
#15

12-07-2004, 07:41 AM

I don't mind huge pics as long as it hq. hq pics rock

Fuck My Sig Good
ICQ - 203744959
Comment
kowntafit

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 4667
Share

Post
#16

12-07-2004, 07:43 AM

I personally like large high quality pics.

This is where my next million is coming from!
Comment
TheFrog

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 4095
Share

Post
#17

12-07-2004, 07:44 AM

huge pics
Comment
BV

wtf

Join Date: Sep 2001

Posts: 10914
Share

Post
#18

12-07-2004, 08:02 AM

My theory is that if you show them little shitty pictures then they might assume that that's what you have inside the members area.

Plus you have a much better chance of getting listed at tgps with better quality larger pics. TheHun for example like big clear pics.

At least 800 x 600 IMHO
Comment
Roald

SecretFriends.com

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 27910
Share

Post
#19

12-07-2004, 08:04 AM

I love the superglam girls

WE ARE BUYING PAY SITES! CONTACT ME

ClubSweethearts | ManUpFilms | SinfulXXX | HOT * AdultPrime * HOT

Paying webmasters since 1996! Contact: r.riepen @ sansylgroup.com | telegram: roaldr
Comment
hova

Traffillionaire

Join Date: Jan 2002

Posts: 22430
Share

Post
#20

12-07-2004, 08:07 AM

Surfers love big quality pics

http://traffillions.com/

Sign up and get lifetime revshare on your traffic
Comment
macho

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2001

Posts: 2875
Share

Post
#21

12-07-2004, 08:31 AM

Nice pics!

GayPay X2 -- #1in the niche! $35 per sign! Up to 70% revenue share! http://www.gaypay.com
Comment
xclusive

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Apr 2004

Posts: 35218
Share

Post
#22

12-07-2004, 08:33 AM

I will be offering my surfers an option of low and high quality it's not that much extra work...

I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /
Comment
Damian_Maxcash

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 12745
Share

Post
#23

12-07-2004, 08:39 AM

I did a couple of gals with a link to a "super high res" version under the thumb

They did ok..... but it evened out with the BW bill.... so I dont bother
Comment
NinjaSteve

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Dec 2003

Posts: 11089
Share

Post
#24

12-07-2004, 08:51 AM

When the picture is 2x the size of the monitor (or resoultion) I find it annoying. That's what you're dealing with when the 40% have 800x600 people.

...
Comment
EZRhino

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 6258
Share

Post
#25

12-07-2004, 09:19 AM

Originally posted by Fukeneh
20% sounds a bit off to me. i think its more like 40% now.

What I understood in the last survey 20% is about right
Comment
Lust

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 209
Share

Post
#26

12-07-2004, 09:43 AM

I think pics 800*600 will be good, if they not cropped

SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
Comment
ErhardtEckbert

Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2005

Posts: 36
Share

Post
#27

01-23-2006, 09:18 AM

3 Megapixel Sponsor Pics!

Hello,

in the case if you need 3 Megapixels picture (as I know no one offers this superb quality on the net yet) - you have to use AdPayout.
Both AdPayout sites ( www.eveangel.com and www.myadiamond.com ) using 3 Megapixel pictures in ALL sets! (And there is daily updates!)

No competitors with AdPayout .

SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60. Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...