|
I really like Oystein and the Mansion crew, and I really never had many problems with the support department. MPA2 and MPA3 are both great pieces of software, BUT once I switched from CCBill to MPA2 I lost alot of traffic and in turn sales because many of my webmasters were upset that we started using MPA2.
We have been around for almost 7 years now, and even though all the webmasters that have worked with us before know we are honest and above board, some of them started to shy away from using the MPA program we had. I had no choice but to run MPA and CCBill together which defeats the purpose of using it.
We have now switched to NATS and many of the features that I wanted in MPA that I would have had to pay extra for, are all included standard in NATS.
The bottom line to me was credibility. MPA worked fine, but the stigma that is carried with it, and me having to reassure my affiliates that we were NOT shaving them was more than I wanted to deal with. We have been getting alot better response from our affiliates, and we now can offer them alot more features for the same money.
|