.XXX tld might be coming soon

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nas7782
    Confirmed User
    • Oct 2003
    • 493

    #1

    .XXX tld might be coming soon

    http://news.com.com/2100-1023-5176438.html?tag=nefd_hed

    New extensions are being submitted again to ICANN, and .xxx might be approve pretty soon. It appears that new.net, the organazation that started to push and sell this extension w/o Icann approval might be getting validated by ICANN. If that is so, there's a whole new ball game.

    What will happen to the current adult .COMs? Will a crazy religious zeleot in Congress force all adult related sites into .xxx?

    These are just a few questions being pondered by many domainers, and the adult industry should look closer at this as well.

    Quote:

    "Stuart Lawley, the president of Toronto-based ICM Registry, said he hopes ICANN will approve his request for .xxx so "responsible adult entertainment businesses can go about their business in a less restricted way"
    Last edited by Nas7782; 03-20-2004, 06:45 PM.
    I sale cheap sigwhore
  • some_idiot
    Confirmed User
    • May 2002
    • 1511

    #2
    What the Hendeles crew is missing here is that it doesn't
    matter what the name space is called. Surfers won't make
    any more type ins in a .xxx namespace then they will in
    any other.

    There are also active movements for .porn and .sex , but it
    seems that we get to read spam here about .xxx on more and
    more regular basis.

    This AVS pays my mortgage!

    Comment

    • Odin88
      Confirmed User
      • Jul 2003
      • 3267

      #3
      It is coming no doubt, and I personally think it is a great move. It has nothing to do with religious zealots, but rather with establishing a suitable structure to the web. Not only would this legitimize adult entertainment online, but it will also help people easily protect their children from seeing inappropriate material, whilst at the same time being able to easily view it themselves. I would also imagine, everyone would be given a chance to register their .xxx alternative (i.e. Adult.com will be notified and asked if they want adult.xxx) and I personally hope it goes through.

      Comment

      • =^..^=
        Confirmed User
        • Jan 2002
        • 6935

        #4
        im taking a gamble with new net domains
        been buying up
        #RememberYourRoots #AaronMForGFYHOF

        Comment

        • Voodoo
          ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
          • Sep 2002
          • 10600

          #5
          Not going to happen.

          #1 - New.net has .xxx already
          http://www.new.net/index_ext.tp?lang_id=english
          which requires a plugin to view. If ICANN adds it to the existing TLDs, there would be legal conflict unless New.net has an agreement with them.

          #2 - No webmaster with any sense would ever use it, since ISPs
          can just filter *.xxx out from their connections, and block them completely.

          "I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."

          Comment

          • Odin88
            Confirmed User
            • Jul 2003
            • 3267

            #6
            Originally posted by Voodoo
            Not going to happen.

            #1 - New.net has .xxx already
            http://www.new.net/index_ext.tp?lang_id=english
            which requires a plugin to view. If ICANN adds it to the existing TLDs, there would be legal conflict unless New.net has an agreement with them.

            #2 - No webmaster with any sense would ever use it, since ISPs
            can just filter *.xxx out from their connections, and block them completely.
            Firstly how does this new.net thing work? How are they authorised to run all these .kids, .church, etc? I am pretty damn sure that ICANN would not have to listen to them in the least, considering ICANN is the appointed officer of these kinds of things. Also, looking through the groups aplication to ICANN it does not make any mention of allowing for those with .com names etc, to have primary chance on registering the .xxx alternative. Damn, can't wait for this to go through if it does - it will be an awesome chance for many.

            Comment

            • some_idiot
              Confirmed User
              • May 2002
              • 1511

              #7
              Originally posted by Odin88
              , but it will also help people easily protect their children from seeing inappropriate material
              This is a common line from these guys, but if you can't block
              access to .com sites from determined people. Example the
              chinese using Google and CNN. How does this idea of .xxx
              make it any easier to keep minors off sites they shouldn't be
              viewing?

              Site access control through namespace is not currently techincally
              feasable without massive changes to the code running on the
              worlds DNS servers. Site access controls are better left to be
              solved at the HTTP protocol with more effective server to browser
              authentication schemes that take content ratings into
              consideration.

              This AVS pays my mortgage!

              Comment

              • Abyss_Vee
                Confirmed User
                • Sep 2003
                • 5208

                #8
                Originally posted by Odin88
                It is coming no doubt, and I personally think it is a great move. It has nothing to do with religious zealots, but rather with establishing a suitable structure to the web. Not only would this legitimize adult entertainment online, but it will also help people easily protect their children from seeing inappropriate material, whilst at the same time being able to easily view it themselves. I would also imagine, everyone would be given a chance to register their .xxx alternative (i.e. Adult.com will be notified and asked if they want adult.xxx) and I personally hope it goes through.
                yep

                Comment

                • Voodoo
                  ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
                  • Sep 2002
                  • 10600

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Odin88


                  Firstly how does this new.net thing work? How are they authorised to run all these .kids, .church, etc? I am pretty damn sure that ICANN would not have to listen to them in the least, considering ICANN is the appointed officer of these kinds of things. Also, looking through the groups aplication to ICANN it does not make any mention of allowing for those with .com names etc, to have primary chance on registering the .xxx alternative. Damn, can't wait for this to go through if it does - it will be an awesome chance for many.
                  All the technical specs are on their site. It's an interesting read. Most hosts support the new.net domains now, just not many people use them. It has somewhat gone the way of SVG.

                  ICANN is not the dictator of all that is a "domain". They only handle what is on their system, which is so far... The "Standard". This does not mean that they cannot be bypassed.

                  This is the internet, welcome. You can pretty much do anything if you know how.

                  "I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."

                  Comment

                  • some_idiot
                    Confirmed User
                    • May 2002
                    • 1511

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Voodoo
                    Not going to happen.

                    #1 - New.net has .xxx already
                    http://www.new.net/index_ext.tp?lang_id=english
                    which requires a plugin to view. If ICANN adds it to the existing TLDs, there would be legal conflict unless New.net has an agreement with them.
                    Take the time to read the ICM site and you'll notice that one
                    of the seats on it's board is filled by Ronald Appleby.

                    These seemingly 2 different .xxx ventures are actually just 1.

                    This AVS pays my mortgage!

                    Comment

                    • serious
                      Confirmed User
                      • May 2003
                      • 2594

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Odin88


                      Firstly how does this new.net thing work? How are they authorised to run all these .kids, .church, etc? I am pretty damn sure that ICANN would not have to listen to them in the least, considering ICANN is the appointed officer of these kinds of things.
                      there is a process to go through to make new tlds, it costs a lot of money but if approved you get controlling rights to the tld, so you can sell them, new.net is trying to make .xxx a real tld instead of one needing a plugin to view. im pretty sure thats how it goes anyway

                      regardless a future where all adult material is on .xxx's would make it very easy to prevent kids from seeing any adult material on the web which would be agreat plus, but how do you police such a thing and make sure no one has adult content on regular domains. also if such a thing happened all of a sudden millions of domains would suddenly be useless, costing companies millions of dollars, would people be able to get there current domains in .xxx form? as someone said above that would also be difficult from new.net actually selling .xxx's already.

                      it might be a better situation if the extension wasn't something already being sold.
                      new search

                      Comment

                      • Voodoo
                        ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
                        • Sep 2002
                        • 10600

                        #12
                        Originally posted by some_idiot


                        Take the time to read the ICM site and you'll notice that one
                        of the seats on it's board is filled by Ronald Appleby.

                        These seemingly 2 different .xxx ventures are actually just 1.

                        "unless New.net has an agreement with them"

                        "I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."

                        Comment

                        • Nas7782
                          Confirmed User
                          • Oct 2003
                          • 493

                          #13
                          Yes, new.net will probably have an agreement w/ ICANN if this deal goes through. New.net has enough resources to challenge ICANN and make it very complicated, so most likely, the .xxx extension will be coming through new.net
                          I sale cheap sigwhore

                          Comment

                          • Odin88
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jul 2003
                            • 3267

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Nas7782
                            Yes, new.net will probably have an agreement w/ ICANN if this deal goes through. New.net has enough resources to challenge ICANN and make it very complicated, so most likely, the .xxx extension will be coming through new.net
                            It will suck if those domains already registered on new.net now become the accepted domain names for the new .xxx alternative.

                            Comment

                            • some_idiot
                              Confirmed User
                              • May 2002
                              • 1511

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Odin88


                              It will suck if those domains already registered on new.net now become the accepted domain names for the new .xxx alternative.
                              The new.net and the ICM ventures for .xxx appear to both be
                              backed by Hendeles. Mr. Appleby proves the common tie.

                              This AVS pays my mortgage!

                              Comment

                              • Nas7782
                                Confirmed User
                                • Oct 2003
                                • 493

                                #16
                                Yes, it would suck. It means people who had registered it will be in conflict w/ dot Commers.
                                I sale cheap sigwhore

                                Comment

                                • Odin88
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jul 2003
                                  • 3267

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by some_idiot


                                  The new.net and the ICM ventures for .xxx appear to both be
                                  backed by Hendeles. Mr. Appleby proves the common tie.
                                  Yes, but hopefully he is greedy as most and disregards all previous registers and requires everyone to register through the official system. Would be good ;) Still though, a great chance to pick up some good ones.

                                  Comment

                                  • tony299
                                    lurker
                                    • Aug 2002
                                    • 57021

                                    #18
                                    .xxx domain is a very bad thing for our industry. It will be zoning ourselves out of business.

                                    Comment

                                    • Living For Today
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Feb 2002
                                      • 3970

                                      #19
                                      Lets hope this doesn't go ahead.

                                      Comment

                                      • Roger
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Jul 2003
                                        • 3181

                                        #20
                                        I think it's good but only if those who own the .com domains get there chance to register the .xxx domains first.

                                        Comment

                                        • Roger
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Jul 2003
                                          • 3181

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Voodoo
                                          #2 - No webmaster with any sense would ever use it, since ISPs can just filter *.xxx out from their connections, and block
                                          them completely.
                                          Really? What kind of stupid ISPs would do that? They'll loose lots of customers.

                                          Comment

                                          • brizzad
                                            holla
                                            • Jul 2003
                                            • 11769

                                            #22
                                            anyone wanna buy FreePorn.club ?

                                            Comment

                                            • Mr.Fiction
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Feb 2002
                                              • 9484

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Odin88
                                              It is coming no doubt, and I personally think it is a great move. It has nothing to do with religious zealots, but rather with establishing a suitable structure to the web. Not only would this legitimize adult entertainment online, but it will also help people easily protect their children from seeing inappropriate material, whilst at the same time being able to easily view it themselves. I would also imagine, everyone would be given a chance to register their .xxx alternative (i.e. Adult.com will be notified and asked if they want adult.xxx) and I personally hope it goes through.
                                              It is a horrible idea and one that has repeatedly been rejected by the top free speech lawyers in the United States as well as the major players in the adult industry.

                                              Do some reasearch on the history of the fight over .xxx and you will see how wrong you are.
                                              Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                                              Comment

                                              • rowan
                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                • Mar 2002
                                                • 17393

                                                #24
                                                Forcing adult sites to move from .com to .xxx would be ridiculous. Around here XXX means explicit sexual content... what happens if you have an erotic or posing only site? It's still an adult site, but it's certainly not XXX.

                                                Comment

                                                • Mr.Fiction
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Feb 2002
                                                  • 9484

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by serious


                                                  but how do you police such a thing and make sure no one has adult content on regular domains.
                                                  That would never happen without a huge court fight.

                                                  .XXX is a horrible idea whose only purpose is to promote censorship and sales of more domains by the company selling them.

                                                  If you want a real solution to protecting kids, then you should support a .kids domain, not a .xxx.

                                                  Forcing sites you don't agree with into another domain, which can easily be filtered by ISPs, is an attack on free speech and anyone who supports it in the adult industry needs to do some more research before you actively help the anti-porn crowd put you out of business.
                                                  Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                                                  Comment

                                                  • AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
                                                    best designer on GFY
                                                    • Mar 2003
                                                    • 30307

                                                    #26
                                                    Even if XXX goes to a TLD it wont stop .com adult oriented TLD's even if US legislation is past to force it. There is one thing that stands in the way of fucked up American Politicians...

                                                    And that would be...

                                                    THE WORLD.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Rictor
                                                      Old Timer
                                                      • Jan 2001
                                                      • 12208

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by some_idiot
                                                      What the Hendeles crew is missing here is that it doesn't
                                                      matter what the name space is called. Surfers won't make
                                                      any more type ins in a .xxx namespace then they will in
                                                      any other.

                                                      There are also active movements for .porn and .sex , but it
                                                      seems that we get to read spam here about .xxx on more and
                                                      more regular basis.
                                                      Of course, it would be easier for Google or other engines to filter out the .xxx extension if all porn were located on this extension (for people that wanted it filtered out...parents and such).

                                                      Comment

                                                      • arg
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Feb 2003
                                                        • 1164

                                                        #28
                                                        Withh the past TLD additions, ICANN made a point of disallowing previously-registered names on those TLDs to be "grandfathered in." If new.net succeeds with a proposal for an ICANN-backed .xxx, I bet their current .xxx registrants will have no special standing.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Theo
                                                          HAL 9000
                                                          • May 2001
                                                          • 34515

                                                          #29
                                                          it will be stupid for ICANN to validate .xxx
                                                          next day all possible extensions will be in hands of private companies ina hope this will happen again.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Mr.Fiction
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Feb 2002
                                                            • 9484

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by arg
                                                            Withh the past TLD additions, ICANN made a point of disallowing previously-registered names on those TLDs to be "grandfathered in." If new.net succeeds with a proposal for an ICANN-backed .xxx, I bet their current .xxx registrants will have no special standing.
                                                            You're right. ICANN has already said that no one will be granfathered into any of the other new TLDs. If you own porn.xxx now, you will not own it if XXX gets approved by ICANN.

                                                            They would do a lottery after they allow trademark holders to take what they want.
                                                            Last edited by Mr.Fiction; 03-20-2004, 10:35 PM.
                                                            Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                                                            Comment

                                                            • xxxdesign-net
                                                              My hips don't lie
                                                              • Nov 2002
                                                              • 10129

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by Mr.Fiction


                                                              That would never happen without a huge court fight.

                                                              .XXX is a horrible idea whose only purpose is to promote censorship and sales of more domains by the company selling them.

                                                              If you want a real solution to protecting kids, then you should support a .kids domain, not a .xxx.

                                                              Forcing sites you don't agree with into another domain, which can easily be filtered by ISPs, is an attack on free speech and anyone who supports it in the adult industry needs to do some more research before you actively help the anti-porn crowd put you out of business.
                                                              Free speech? Should porn be played on popular TV channels at 5pm for the sake of free speech?! There's nothing wrong with having it on another extension like you would have porn movies playing at 5pm.. on a specialized channel... As for ISPs... all the major ones WONT block it... as for the rare ones who block it... then the free speech argument comes in and users affected will have to take up the issue with those ISPs... You'll also lose the some users living in conservative countries... but look at your paysite's members list... what is their percentage? not much...

                                                              By having a .xxx extension... you just took away all arguments for the Bush admistration to crack down on internet porn... since its now "controlled" ...

                                                              The only major problem I see.. is ok, the .com will transfer to their equivalent with .xxx ... but what about the .net....

                                                              Comment

                                                              • polish_aristocrat
                                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                • Jul 2002
                                                                • 40377

                                                                #32
                                                                who the fuck needs .travel or .mail ???
                                                                The idea of .xxx and especially all adult domains moved to .xxx is fucked up!
                                                                If someone has f.e nudeteens.com and someone other has nudeteens.net, then who should get nudeteens.xxx...
                                                                Is it simply impossible to handle and the whle idea sucks
                                                                I don't use ICQ anymore.

                                                                Comment

                                                                • polish_aristocrat
                                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                  • Jul 2002
                                                                  • 40377

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by tony404
                                                                  .xxx domain is a very bad thing for our industry. It will be zoning ourselves out of business.
                                                                  i agree
                                                                  I don't use ICQ anymore.

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • polish_aristocrat
                                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                    • Jul 2002
                                                                    • 40377

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by Mr.Fiction


                                                                    You're right. ICANN has already said that no one will be granfathered into any of the other new TLDs. If you own porn.xxx now, you will not own it if XXX gets approved by ICANN.

                                                                    They would do a lottery after they allow trademark holders to take what they want.
                                                                    The .info landrush was a joke.
                                                                    I lost money on it because of cheaters with bogus trademarks and a lack of will from Affilias to fight them.
                                                                    I don't use ICQ anymore.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • polish_aristocrat
                                                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                      • Jul 2002
                                                                      • 40377

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by xxxdesign-net




                                                                      The only major problem I see.. is ok, the .com will transfer to their equivalent with .xxx ... but what about the .net....
                                                                      who told you that .com will be transferred to .xxx
                                                                      I am 99% sure, it WON'T !
                                                                      I don't use ICQ anymore.

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • Mr.Fiction
                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                        • Feb 2002
                                                                        • 9484

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by xxxdesign-net


                                                                        Free speech? Should porn be played on popular TV channels at 5pm for the sake of free speech?! There's nothing wrong with having it on another extension like you would have porn movies playing at 5pm.. on a specialized channel... As for ISPs... all the major ones WONT block it... as for the rare ones who block it... then the free speech argument comes in and users affected will have to take up the issue with those ISPs... You'll also lose the some users living in conservative countries... but look at your paysite's members list... what is their percentage? not much...

                                                                        By having a .xxx extension... you just took away all arguments for the Bush admistration to crack down on internet porn... since its now "controlled" ...

                                                                        The only major problem I see.. is ok, the .com will transfer to their equivalent with .xxx ... but what about the .net....
                                                                        You are 100% wrong. Again, this issue has been debated by free speech lawyers and industry people for years, and it's almost universaly rejected by people who care about free speech (and the adult industry making money) who take the time to understand the issue.

                                                                        Making an XXX extension doesn't take away the government's interest in censoring porn, nothing does that. Do you think the justice department will suddenly like porn because it's on a .xxx domain? That's is ridiculous. It just makes it much easier to censor adult content. Look at what has been happening with Visa and Mastercard. Do you believe that the government has no influence over decisions that private companies make?

                                                                        By making a mandatory .xxx extension, you are giving the government all the tools they need to shut down all adult content on the internet by putting pressure on private companies to block access to .xxx domains.

                                                                        Even if the government didn't do anything, can't you imagine AOL, Earthlink, and others deciding that .xxx should be blocked because a few right wing idiots threaten to boycott? Look what happened with Janet's boob on the superbowl. Why do you think that the right wing wouldn't force every major ISP to block .xxx?

                                                                        Who decides what is on .xxx? The government? Do you think that softcore should be on .xxx? What about bikini content? What about GFY?

                                                                        Why not just support a .kids extension and let adults enjoy the full internet? The internet is not intended for children unsupervised. It never was and it never will be. If you want to make the entire internet kid friendly, because you are too lazy to monitor your children, then you are destroying the entire interet and killing free speech.
                                                                        Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • Odin88
                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                          • Jul 2003
                                                                          • 3267

                                                                          #37
                                                                          double post

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • Odin88
                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                            • Jul 2003
                                                                            • 3267

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Originally posted by polish_aristocrat

                                                                            who told you that .com will be transferred to .xxx
                                                                            I am 99% sure, it WON'T !
                                                                            Whoa, with this and the fact that ICANN seems to be against grandfathering of domains, I can't wait for this shit to happen. It will be an absolute crazy rush to register these domains, but I am sure if you are truly prepared you can pick up many nice ones. Oh, it is giving me a hard on thinking about it...

                                                                            (btw, the free speech arguement is a joke, .xxx would allow for quite a degree of responsible regulation within the industry)

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • Mr.Fiction
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • Feb 2002
                                                                              • 9484

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by Odin88


                                                                              Pornography is nt speach
                                                                              Are you a troll?

                                                                              Adult content is speech protected by the constitution like political speech, art, or anything else.

                                                                              No matter what you and Bush might want, there is no distinction in the constitution for speech that you don't like.

                                                                              Go to the library and read a few books, unless you don't think books are speech either?
                                                                              Last edited by Mr.Fiction; 03-21-2004, 12:24 AM.
                                                                              Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • polish_aristocrat
                                                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                • Jul 2002
                                                                                • 40377

                                                                                #40
                                                                                Originally posted by Odin88


                                                                                Whoa, with this and the fact that ICANN seems to be against grandfathering of domains, I can't wait for this shit to happen. It will be an absolute crazy rush to register these domains, but I am sure if you are truly prepared you can pick up many nice ones. Oh, it is giving me a hard on thinking about it...
                                                                                I was quite good prepared for the .info pre-rgistration process.
                                                                                I pre registered with different companies, paying often non refundable fees domains like casino.info, holiday.info, wallstreet.info, impotence.info etc. but these names went mostly to cheaters who claimed to have a trademark for "impotence.info" in South Africa.
                                                                                It was not a fair process.
                                                                                Where big money comes into the game, small, or honest people not always have a chance to win.

                                                                                The good thing is onlt that i Got 2 shitty adult domains from the .info Landrush and noone wanted to buy them, so i entered the adult biz to develop them.

                                                                                But as Mr. Fiction already said, who should decide what content should be moved there and who should control it?
                                                                                If USA introduced a law that doesn't allow adult content on the current extensions, the who will control it?
                                                                                How about poeple from the Netherlands, from offhore jurisdictions, or from Russia, from Poland ???

                                                                                This idea is bad...it doesn't matter if you call it free speach or not...but you cannot tell that the ISP's won;t filter porn, because they lose customers...
                                                                                Visa would also lose money when they eliminate adult rebills, but that danger is still real...
                                                                                I don't use ICQ anymore.

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • Odin88
                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                  • Jul 2003
                                                                                  • 3267

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  Originally posted by Mr.Fiction


                                                                                  Are you a troll?

                                                                                  Adult content is speech protected by the constitution just like political speech, art, or anything else.

                                                                                  No matter what you and Bush might want, there is no distinction in the constitution for speech that you don't like.

                                                                                  Go to the library and read a few books, unless you don't think books are speech either?
                                                                                  I deleted that bit anyway, as I know it came out wrong. What I was trying to convey was that putting pornography on a different tld is not an attack on pornograph or its right to be seen by those legally allowed to view it. It is illegal for children to view pornography, as such it can not simply be seen as an inherent right for it to be freely available. Just as hanging a piss in your toilet is legal, but hanging a piss in front of 30 people in daylight is illegal. Although it is hard to put forward what I am trying to say, in my opinion it won't affect our right to portray adult erotica to those allowed to see it.

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • Mr.Fiction
                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                    • Feb 2002
                                                                                    • 9484

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    Originally posted by Odin88


                                                                                    I deleted that bit anyway, as I know it came out wrong. What I was trying to convey was that putting pornography on a different tld is not an attack on pornograph or its right to be seen by those legally allowed to view it. It is illegal for children to view pornography, as such it can not simply be seen as an inherent right for it to be freely available. Just as hanging a piss in your toilet is legal, but hanging a piss in front of 30 people in daylight is illegal. Although it is hard to put forward what I am trying to say, in my opinion it won't affect our right to portray adult erotica to those allowed to see it.
                                                                                    Why not take the other approach and support .kids for sites that are safe for kids. It's a much better solution if you want to find a way for kids to surf the internet "safely".

                                                                                    Even if you got all U.S. "porn" site off of .com (which would never happen), what about Nazi sites and anti-abortion sites with graphics pics, and ******* and non U.S. sites?

                                                                                    Instead of attacking free speech for adults, you could make a .kids domain and only allow sites that are safe for kids. It makes more sense.
                                                                                    Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • Odin88
                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                      • Jul 2003
                                                                                      • 3267

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      Originally posted by Mr.Fiction


                                                                                      Why not take the other approach and support .kids for sites that are safe for kids. It's a much better solution if you want to find a way for kids to surf the internet "safely".

                                                                                      Even if you got all U.S. "porn" site off of .com (which would never happen), what about Nazi sites and anti-abortion sites with graphics pics, and ******* and non U.S. sites?

                                                                                      Instead of attacking free speech for adults, you could make a .kids domain and only allow sites that are safe for kids. It makes more sense.
                                                                                      A reasonable solution, however (I dare to say) MOST sites on the web are suitable for a child audience anyway.

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • Alex Xe

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        I ready to buy .xxx domains

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • Steen2
                                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                                          • Feb 2004
                                                                                          • 7662

                                                                                          #45
                                                                                          New.net will never get ICANN's approval.


                                                                                          Easy as that


                                                                                          Maybe a 5% chance of it.
                                                                                          ICQ: 2262.73945

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • Tippy
                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                            • Oct 2003
                                                                                            • 1772

                                                                                            #46
                                                                                            New.net names are crap and always have been, once .xxx is released/approved all will finally relize this, wasted $...

                                                                                            Mike
                                                                                            VPS 1 - 1.5 GB RAM, 10 GB SSD - 11.88 euro/year
                                                                                            VPS 2 - 4 GB RAM, 40 GB SSD - 60 euro/year


                                                                                            Alexhost.com - your access to the best hosting services VPS.

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • lock
                                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                                              • Jul 2003
                                                                                              • 5065

                                                                                              #47
                                                                                              For those looking to buy visit http://www.xxxextension.com I own http://www.webmasters.xxx 10k to buy today.
                                                                                              Traffic.Tools - 40+ Free Tools
                                                                                              Free.Marketing - 150+ Free Tools
                                                                                              Submission.Tools
                                                                                              - 20+ Free Tools

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • maxjohan
                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                • Dec 2002
                                                                                                • 7219

                                                                                                #48
                                                                                                Originally posted by Roger


                                                                                                Really? What kind of stupid ISPs would do that? They'll loose lots of customers.
                                                                                                Why doesnt yahoo.com sell porn?

                                                                                                I went from 100 to 313,000 satoshis in 2 days! Lots of daily freerolls...

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • Tippy
                                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                                  • Oct 2003
                                                                                                  • 1772

                                                                                                  #49
                                                                                                  Lock if thats a new.net Domain which it is, your pucked

                                                                                                  Mike
                                                                                                  VPS 1 - 1.5 GB RAM, 10 GB SSD - 11.88 euro/year
                                                                                                  VPS 2 - 4 GB RAM, 40 GB SSD - 60 euro/year


                                                                                                  Alexhost.com - your access to the best hosting services VPS.

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • Basic_man
                                                                                                    Programming King Pin
                                                                                                    • Oct 2003
                                                                                                    • 27360

                                                                                                    #50
                                                                                                    Who care? .com for ever !
                                                                                                    UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress!
                                                                                                    Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    Working...