Professional Content VS "Girls Gone Wild" Style Content

**xenigo** · 03-12-2004, 04:53 PM

Indeed. This is why reality content is such a hot trend right now.

**necoeds** · 03-12-2004, 05:00 PM

**Los** · 03-12-2004, 05:26 PM

girls gone wild content most def

**latinasojourn** · 03-12-2004, 05:44 PM

Originally posted by Babagirls
I personally think that shooting pics of girls in REAL surroundings are more appealing rather than a girl "almost" licking the nipple of another woman with a backdrop & tons of makeup and striking poses for the camera.

Wouldnt a guy want to see something that HE could acutally see in the real world or even (fantasize) about being involved in??

Discuss.

exactly.

you think like most surfers.

if you shoot studio type content, with anything that looks like it's posed you can barely get the surfer to look at it for nothing, let alone buy a membership to see it.

content shooters haven't figured out why their stuff does not sell, but this is a common reason.

**exspamr** · 03-12-2004, 05:52 PM

better watch out, that putz who owns ggw might sue you for using the name in the title of this thread

**Living For Today** · 03-12-2004, 06:03 PM

alot of the girls in that type of content arent to good looking tho.

**Steve** · 03-12-2004, 06:06 PM

Originally posted by Living For Today
alot of the girls in that type of content arent to good looking tho.

a lot of the people walking around in real life aren't too good looking either

I think a slutty, average looking chick in reality content works better than your typical glamour girl, because it adds just a little more realism.

Professional Content VS "Girls Gone Wild" Style Content

Professional Content VS "Girls Gone Wild" Style Content

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment