View Single Post
Old 11-08-2004, 08:41 PM  
CET
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,754
Quote:
Originally posted by detoxed
He didnt attack Bush on his fuckups. He didnt call him out on it. If he would have gone after Bush, he probably could have won it. Several experts have already said this.
I listened to his stump speeches most every day, and most every stump speech was nothing more then "Bush fucked this away, then he fucked that away, now he's fucking this other thing away, etc."

If you think more attacks would have won the day, then why hasn't that approach ever gotten anyone elected? Every single election I have ever seen in my entire life where one guy attacks the other, the guy who does the least amount of mud slinging has always gotten elected.
__________________
Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!

Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training

"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."

Last edited by CET; 11-08-2004 at 08:43 PM..
CET is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote