wow pretty big car isnt it
2005 Chevy Camero! (Pics)
Collapse
X
-
Awesome! I also own an 86 Iroc. :DOriginally posted by Ian
That is gorgeous. Until recently I had a "86 IrocZ and I loved it.
Comment
-
http://www.hot-rod.ru/images/1969chevycamaro.jpg
My boyfriend brings these cars to europe to sell
have i love this car but he said no i will kill my selfFreedom for life, life for freedom
http://www.smokers.com
http://www.face-pic.com/yana12Comment
-
Comment
-
A Camaro is a cheap Corvette
A Corvette is a Ferrari wannabe9 Years of SOLID payouts and conversions!

ADULT DATING - $100 PPS
LIVE CAMS - $214 PPS
WWW.DATINGGOLD.COM
ICQ: 27442303Comment
-
-
i hope it's super expensive, so a bunch of fucking little kids can't buy them, and act like idiots on my roadsComment
-
that's cool!
Need Mainstream Content and SEO?
SEO * Website Copy * Blogs
Blogging - PR Work - Forum Marketing - Social Marketing - Link building - Articles
100% Guaranteed Content!
Comment
-
mountain dew, old milwaukee, walmart, mullet, nascar, wwfOriginally posted by ajpiii
this cant be 2k5 can it ? any details as to whats going to be under the hood ?9 Years of SOLID payouts and conversions!

ADULT DATING - $100 PPS
LIVE CAMS - $214 PPS
WWW.DATINGGOLD.COM
ICQ: 27442303Comment
-
The Camaro was discontinued. That's someone's computer drawn fantasy concept. It'll never happen.
Like Veteran's Day said: they don't discontinue successful cars.
Bad Girl Bucks - 50% Revshare through CCBill.
Promote BrandyDDD, Pixie's Pillows, Action Allie and more!
Phoenix Forum Pics | Webmaster Access Montreal pics
email: psyko514(a)gmail.com | icq: 214-702-014Comment
-
Originally posted by psyko514
The Camaro was discontinued. That's someone's computer drawn fantasy concept. It'll never happen.
Like Veteran's Day said: they don't discontinue successful cars.
too bad, I would definately buy one...Insert Sig HereComment
-
for those who want to know, the production of the F body was actually stopped not necessarily due to GM's direct decision to remove the camaro, but due to the fact that they had to close the canadian plant that _produces_ the camaro.
the reason the mustang outsold the camaro is simple. it was a cheap car. you could get into a basic v6 manual stripped mustang cheaper than a base-model camaro. and everyone from 16 y.o. girls to great grandmas were (are) getting in on the action. hell, some families would buy several at a time. and why not get a piece of american history for each kid when it's cheaper than a new corolla?
with the extra price of the camaro generally came extra performance. and the sad part is, it wasn't a whole lot more expensive
they're both nice cars tho, and i hope the camaro makes a comeback. GM has been replacing it with things like the GTO, SSR (which is a pretty nice replacement, but not the same), and they've got a new roadster concept that could be promising. they even thought about bringing back the bel-air with a mucho retardo I-5 turbo and a body that looked like a cross of a late-model malibu and a poor attempt at retro 57 bel-air convertible. but i see gmc is making a truck with an i-5 now
in my opinion, over the years, from best to worst, i'd rank it the models this way:
1 - 1st generation
2- 3rd generation (i'm biased ;) )
3 - 4.5 generation
and #4 is tied between 2nd generation and early 4th gens. i've never been a fan of the 2nd gens, but the nasty "geo" front end and ugly wheels they slapped on most 4th gens really made it a poor looker. although some of the slp units with racing strupes and 5-spoke vette wheels looked fairly decent, the rest sucked (even the colors weren't that great on most).
and if anyone's else is wondering, that color combo on the green is a classic color as well
<a href="http://www.iroc409.com/"><img src="http://www.iroc409.com/adv/120x60.gif" border=0></a>
icq: 1 7 6 4 2 0 9 6 0
Gallery templates for ONLY $25! w00t!Comment
-
That's a concept, not the production model. Although the production model is still extremely beautiful, it doesn't compare to that concept.Originally posted by RocHard
The Camaro is dead. Gone. It just doesn't match up to the FORD MUSTANG.
Check out the new Mustang:
I got to sit in the production model 3 weeks ago in Toronto at an auto show. Fucking beautiful!
Bad Girl Bucks - 50% Revshare through CCBill.
Promote BrandyDDD, Pixie's Pillows, Action Allie and more!
Phoenix Forum Pics | Webmaster Access Montreal pics
email: psyko514(a)gmail.com | icq: 214-702-014Comment
-
Just found this quote somewhere... pretty interesting:
"From what I understand, the main thing that killed the F-body wasn't poor sales or any specific issues with the car - any issues with the car could have been addressed during a redesign (which was due anyway) and a new version would have likely spiked sales as well.
The main issue was that the Quebec plant that built them was only capable of building F-bodies. It wasn't economically feasible to retool to introduce another product into the plant. Having a second product would have meant that when demand eased for Camaros and Firebirds, the capacity could have been used for another car. Without that flexibility, the plant became unprofitable at 80,000 cars a year - there was just too much unused capacity.
While the GTO will only sell 18000 units this year, it is built in a plant in Australia that produces the near-identical Monaro for the domestic market. Plus, that basic platform is the foundation of a whole bunch of cars in Australia. So, it's not like the plant is only building 18000 units; if anythign adding demand in another region (North America) is just one more way to insure the plant will stay productive and profitable.
I've heard (but not confirmed) that the CAW contract in Quebec stated that GM could not simply move F-body production somewhere else without a huge cost penalty. Thus, the only way to get out of the plant and its idle capacity was to kill the F-body for a couple of years. If GM can find a market, the name (at least the Camaro) will likely come back and address looks/ride/packaging concerns. And it will likely be built in a plant along side some more prosaic sedan to insure that when sales goes down (as they nearly always do when a sporty car hits its third year), the capacity can be used to produce another line. "
Bad Girl Bucks - 50% Revshare through CCBill.
Promote BrandyDDD, Pixie's Pillows, Action Allie and more!
Phoenix Forum Pics | Webmaster Access Montreal pics
email: psyko514(a)gmail.com | icq: 214-702-014Comment
-
bingo.Originally posted by psyko514
Just found this quote somewhere... pretty interesting:
"From what I understand, the main thing that killed the F-body wasn't poor sales or any specific issues with the car - any issues with the car could have been addressed during a redesign (which was due anyway) and a new version would have likely spiked sales as well.
The main issue was that the Quebec plant that built them was only capable of building F-bodies. It wasn't economically feasible to retool to introduce another product into the plant. Having a second product would have meant that when demand eased for Camaros and Firebirds, the capacity could have been used for another car. Without that flexibility, the plant became unprofitable at 80,000 cars a year - there was just too much unused capacity.
While the GTO will only sell 18000 units this year, it is built in a plant in Australia that produces the near-identical Monaro for the domestic market. Plus, that basic platform is the foundation of a whole bunch of cars in Australia. So, it's not like the plant is only building 18000 units; if anythign adding demand in another region (North America) is just one more way to insure the plant will stay productive and profitable.
I've heard (but not confirmed) that the CAW contract in Quebec stated that GM could not simply move F-body production somewhere else without a huge cost penalty. Thus, the only way to get out of the plant and its idle capacity was to kill the F-body for a couple of years. If GM can find a market, the name (at least the Camaro) will likely come back and address looks/ride/packaging concerns. And it will likely be built in a plant along side some more prosaic sedan to insure that when sales goes down (as they nearly always do when a sporty car hits its third year), the capacity can be used to produce another line. "
and i don't think the mustang is a total piece of crap, although i'm not a ford fan and would never own one. i just prefer the chevy.
i used to hang out with a couple mustang familes, they mostly had first gens. in fact, one had a completely beautiful 68 mustang. it was an awesome restore. unfortunately, it was a dog. he put a truck crate 302 in it with an edelbrock dual-4bbl. the carbs killed it so much it spits raw fuel out the tailpipes, even with a reduction linkage to the 2nd card
Last edited by iroc409; 03-10-2004, 05:32 PM.<a href="http://www.iroc409.com/"><img src="http://www.iroc409.com/adv/120x60.gif" border=0></a>
icq: 1 7 6 4 2 0 9 6 0
Gallery templates for ONLY $25! w00t!Comment
-
ya no shit dual quads on a crate small block is a joke. Dual quads on 500 inches and over with heads minimum.Originally posted by iroc409
bingo.
and i don't think the mustang is a total piece of crap, although i'm not a ford fan and would never own one. i just prefer the chevy.
i used to hang out with a couple mustang familes, they mostly had first gens. in fact, one had a completely beautiful 68 mustang. it was an awesome restore. unfortunately, it was a dog. he put a truck crate 302 in it with an edelbrock dual-4bbl. the carbs killed it so much it spits raw fuel out the tailpipes, even with a reduction linkage to the 2nd card
Comment
-
Originally posted by Veterans Day
ya no shit dual quads on a crate small block is a joke. Dual quads on 500 inches and over with heads minimum.
but you have to admit, dual quads on anything looks damn cool
if i remember my math, a holley 850 will run a 302 to like 8000 rpm or something... lol. so many people use so much overkill on their motors
<a href="http://www.iroc409.com/"><img src="http://www.iroc409.com/adv/120x60.gif" border=0></a>
icq: 1 7 6 4 2 0 9 6 0
Gallery templates for ONLY $25! w00t!Comment
-
no way 650 with vacuum secondarys on a small block anything under 400 inches with stock heads, anything bigger and it will be a pig.Originally posted by iroc409
but you have to admit, dual quads on anything looks damn cool
if i remember my math, a holley 850 will run a 302 to like 8000 rpm or something... lol. so many people use so much overkill on their motors

Heres one we built 3 years ago with dual quads 707 inchLast edited by Veterans Day; 03-11-2004, 09:38 PM.Comment
-
Interesting. From what I heard, the 4th gen f-body didn't meet 2003 crash standards. That, mixed with poor sales, (Suv's totally outsold them) Chevy discontinued them.Originally posted by iroc409
for those who want to know, the production of the F body was actually stopped not necessarily due to GM's direct decision to remove the camaro, but due to the fact that they had to close the canadian plant that _produces_ the camaro.
the reason the mustang outsold the camaro is simple. it was a cheap car. you could get into a basic v6 manual stripped mustang cheaper than a base-model camaro. and everyone from 16 y.o. girls to great grandmas were (are) getting in on the action. hell, some families would buy several at a time. and why not get a piece of american history for each kid when it's cheaper than a new corolla?
with the extra price of the camaro generally came extra performance. and the sad part is, it wasn't a whole lot more expensive
they're both nice cars tho, and i hope the camaro makes a comeback. GM has been replacing it with things like the GTO, SSR (which is a pretty nice replacement, but not the same), and they've got a new roadster concept that could be promising. they even thought about bringing back the bel-air with a mucho retardo I-5 turbo and a body that looked like a cross of a late-model malibu and a poor attempt at retro 57 bel-air convertible. but i see gmc is making a truck with an i-5 now
in my opinion, over the years, from best to worst, i'd rank it the models this way:
1 - 1st generation
2- 3rd generation (i'm biased ;) )
3 - 4.5 generation
and #4 is tied between 2nd generation and early 4th gens. i've never been a fan of the 2nd gens, but the nasty "geo" front end and ugly wheels they slapped on most 4th gens really made it a poor looker. although some of the slp units with racing strupes and 5-spoke vette wheels looked fairly decent, the rest sucked (even the colors weren't that great on most).
and if anyone's else is wondering, that color combo on the green is a classic color as well
Real shame. With the underestimated HP the LS1 camaros put out, (98+) they were said to be the best performance-dollar car out on the market.
I'd agree, from all i've read at ls1tech.com.Comment
-
That car looks totally crazy.

RecurCash.com - Averaging $38/sale with 60% revshare in the first 4 months alone!
Convert your TEEN traffic today @ better than 1:500 guaranteed. ICQ me: 18287590!Comment
-
Originally posted by Veterans Day
no way 650 with vacuum secondarys on a small block anything under 400 inches with stock heads, anything bigger and it will be a pig.
Heres one we built 3 years ago with dual quads 707 inch

RecurCash.com - Averaging $38/sale with 60% revshare in the first 4 months alone!
Convert your TEEN traffic today @ better than 1:500 guaranteed. ICQ me: 18287590!Comment
-
-
I've been dreaming for that kind of car!
Need Mainstream Content and SEO?
SEO * Website Copy * Blogs
Blogging - PR Work - Forum Marketing - Social Marketing - Link building - Articles
100% Guaranteed Content!
Comment
-
-
That is one badass looking Camaro. If they came out with that one I would think about buying. Myself I'm a huge Mustang fan.. I own a 92 with 350HP. So I'm looking forward for the new 2005..Comment


Comment