|
Well, I am no expert on KK, but odds are you will get the blanket response that ANY processor would give you, and that would be to report the site to the processor. KK is no lawyer, so it is not really in her best interest to make legal judgement calls. If I get questions regarding technical issues of any program I am associated with, I direct those questions to those best suited to answer that question, the coders. If I did decide to answer, my answer (while it may be slightly informed), wont be nearly as comprehensive and precise as one of my programmers would be able to do. So I am assuming your question is best posed to the ccbill legal department.
Yes, some of the images are iffy... but is it just the fact that they use the term "lolita"? This whole damn industry is fueled by sites that insinuate underage. Its an idea as old as porn itself. It doesnt matter, they will have to comply with Visa soon anyhow on the whole "lolita" issue.
And how many sites you see out there with 2257s? 99% of newbs have no idea what that is while they are spewing out thousands of galleries and AVS sites a day. Im not saying its right, its just a fact of life. I have never heard of a website being busted for lack of it. Content producers seem to care, but joe webmaster could give a rats ass. Again, that doesnt make it right, but you only point it out to nitpick.
I am halfway thru a session of some of the ugliest weed I have ever smoked so I have no idea if any of that made any sense.
|