Kerry Should Have Picked Hillary As His Running Mate - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

KRL

Entrepreneur

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 31429
Share

Post
#1

Kerry Should Have Picked Hillary As His Running Mate

11-03-2004, 05:35 AM

That would have completely changed the dynamics of this election.

As much as I like Edwards, I think his "trial lawyer" image didn't sit well with many voters.

Hillary is someone everyone knows and she would have have pulled the female vote like crazy.

If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains
Tags: None
Bansheelinks

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2003

Posts: 6023
Share

Post
#2

11-03-2004, 05:38 AM

You're wrong, KRL. She wouldn't have swung ONE state for Kerry. Not one. The southern vote and religious evangelicals propelled this Bush victory. She wouldn't have changed a thing. And that is ominous for us in this industry. Very ominous.
Comment
AcidMax

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 1827
Share

Post
#3

11-03-2004, 05:40 AM

Actually I think if Edwards was running for president and Kerry was VP, I think Democrats would have won easily.

Latest MMA news. http://www.mmawrapup.com
Comment
FuqALot

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2001

Posts: 3817
Share

Post
#4

11-03-2004, 05:41 AM

No, I think he's right. A lot of people voted by judging the appearence. Women like women, and will vote for women. But on the other hand I think that they had there reasons not to go that way hehe.
Comment
MrIzzz

If u touch it, I will cum

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 22923
Share

Post
#5

11-03-2004, 05:41 AM

nah, i think that would have been as bad as putting jesse jackson in there, lol

america isnt ready for a minority or a woman as vice president. its gonna be 50 years till we see it.

also, i think the only issue that really hurt kerrys popularity was his outspokenness about vietnam and his medals. unfortunately, people dont realize that an experienced vet has the right to speak about war since he served, but a wanna-be like BUSH has no clue about war

WHO WANTS TO PLAY GRAB-ASS?
Comment
KRL

Entrepreneur

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 31429
Share

Post
#6

11-03-2004, 05:42 AM

Originally posted by AcidMax
Actually I think if Edwards was running for president and Kerry was VP, I think Democrats would have won easily.

Also true, but know one knew who Edwards was prior and that's hard to get over so quickly.

If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains
Comment
KRL

Entrepreneur

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 31429
Share

Post
#7

11-03-2004, 05:42 AM

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
You're wrong, KRL. She wouldn't have swung ONE state for Kerry. Not one. The southern vote and religious evangelicals propelled this Bush victory. She wouldn't have changed a thing. And that is ominous for us in this industry. Very ominous.

I still think she could have grabbed a lot of women.

If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains
Comment
BVF

Black Vagina Finder

Join Date: Jan 2002

Posts: 13975
Share

Post
#8

11-03-2004, 05:42 AM

fuck that...Hillary should have run for president.

Black Pussy
Click On Mr Cosby..CCbill, 60/40, 136 FHG's....The Cos Loves Black Ghetto Pussy!!
Comment
Vendot

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 3376
Share

Post
#9

11-03-2004, 05:42 AM

Kerry is perfect for the job - its just that his personality doesnt come across as much and people do tend to vote for personality.

I just wish they voted on merit - if they did, Kerry would be at the white house.

"In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act." - George Orwell
Comment
xclusive

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Apr 2004

Posts: 35218
Share

Post
#10

11-03-2004, 05:45 AM

I just thank god that I don't have kids of age to be drafted because now that he doesn't have to worry about re-election it's going to happen...

I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /
Comment
CamChicks

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 1552
Share

Post
#11

11-03-2004, 05:46 AM

I would have preferred Kerry/Clark

camchicks.com
Comment
Bansheelinks

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2003

Posts: 6023
Share

Post
#12

11-03-2004, 05:46 AM

Originally posted by KRL
I still think she could have grabbed a lot of women.

And turned off as many men as she would have gained women. This country is not ready for her. Evidence? We elected Bush over a far superior alternative. Not to sound like a broken record, but the new model for getting elected is to appeal to your religiously conservative base, and that means Republicans appealing to religious evangelicals.

These religious maniacs will be drunk with power now because they KNOW they won the election. They know their power. Remember the 80s with the rise of the Moral Majority, and the subsequent Meese Commission and the war on porn?

Its likely to happen again.
Comment
Peaches

Old broad

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 13933
Share

Post
#13

11-03-2004, 05:49 AM

The democrats should have picked a viable candidate.

This guy supposedly won all three debates, had an award winning movie reaming his opponent, had democrats signing up new voters like crazy and he still lost.
Comment
Nysus

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2001

Posts: 7817
Share

Post
#14

11-03-2004, 05:53 AM

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
You're wrong, KRL. She wouldn't have swung ONE state for Kerry. Not one. The southern vote and religious evangelicals propelled this Bush victory. She wouldn't have changed a thing. And that is ominous for us in this industry. Very ominous.

You're right, and sadly anyone who's religious puts that at the top of their decisions, and Bush used that with his wanting to ban gay marriage.

It will be interesting to see the amount of votes Bush got from people who also voted for banning gay marriage.

Matt

Last edited by Nysus; 11-03-2004, 05:54 AM.

What name is pr0 / Untouched Markets using these days? Untouched Markets - pr0 - Refund My Money Now

Someone owes me $2,000 because they didn't do any work that was paid for *pointing at pr0 / William / UntouchedMarkets*

See http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?p=16744521 and for more detailed see http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=948645
Comment
FlyingIguana

aspiring banker

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 10870
Share

Post
#15

11-03-2004, 06:18 AM

Originally posted by KRL
That would have completely changed the dynamics of this election.

As much as I like Edwards, I think his "trial lawyer" image didn't sit well with many voters.

Hillary is someone everyone knows and she would have have pulled the female vote like crazy.

i think the problem was more with kerry than it was edwards
Comment
reynold

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 51271
Share

Post
#16

11-03-2004, 06:24 AM

kerry and hilary. interesting combo.
Comment
TurboAngel

H.B.I.C.

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 30122
Share

Post
#17

11-03-2004, 06:27 AM

Originally posted by KRL
Also true, but know one knew who Edwards was prior and that's hard to get over so quickly.

I did, he's from NC. I thought they had a chance to get NC because of him but that didn't work out that way.
Comment
Dax

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2002

Posts: 3161
Share

Post
#18

11-03-2004, 06:30 AM

Originally posted by BVF
fuck that...Hillary should have run for president.

Hillary 2008 !!
Comment
pornguy

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 62910
Share

Post
#19

11-03-2004, 06:33 AM

I think that she should have run as well. I would have voted for her. I think that she is ten times better than the two idiots that just ran.

PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!
Comment
Gottis

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2004

Posts: 1746
Share

Post
#20

11-03-2004, 06:43 AM

Who's that guy doing CMI updates over at iBill? Kerry/CMI guy would've pulled this off.

Hit me up for ABC link trades - icq 7583011
Comment
GatorB

The Demon & 12clicks

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 18208
Share

Post
#21

11-03-2004, 06:45 AM

Originally posted by KRL
That would have completely changed the dynamics of this election.

As much as I like Edwards, I think his "trial lawyer" image didn't sit well with many voters.

Hillary is someone everyone knows and she would have have pulled the female vote like crazy.

Hillary is a LAWYER, MORON. Kerry would have lost worse. Bush would have REALLY played up the "evil liberal" stuff. And would have brought up Clinton getting his dicked sucked again.
Comment
Bansheelinks

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2003

Posts: 6023
Share

Post
#22

11-03-2004, 06:47 AM

There are a lot of Democrats out there that need a reality check. Evidence of this is this wistful longing for Hillary. She will not be the nominee in 2008 because, by then, the Democrat elite will realize she is unelectable. I'm not thrilled to say this. But I believe, especially after yesterday, that this is the reality we are forced to deal with.

The Dems will be looking for a southerner, who is slightly right-of-center in his social attitudes, and that also precludes John Edwards, who will be seen as too liberal. And it will be a man, not a woman. And definitely not Hillary.
Comment
Paul Markham

Too old to care

Join Date: Jun 2001

Posts: 52942
Share

Post
#23

11-03-2004, 06:54 AM

Originally posted by Peaches
The democrats should have picked a viable candidate.

This guy supposedly won all three debates, had an award winning movie reaming his opponent, had democrats signing up new voters like crazy and he still lost.

You're right I think.

Anyone who could not beat Bush on his record has to be seen as a failure. One of his failings, as I see it was he could be easlily attacked on his record in office. You need a man who can show what he's done in power as well as in uniform.

He was always a bad candidate, like Gore before him.

Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70
Comment
GatorB

The Demon & 12clicks

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 18208
Share

Post
#24

11-03-2004, 06:55 AM

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
The Dems will be looking for a southerner, who is slightly right-of-center in his social attitudes, and that also precludes John Edwards, who will be seen as too liberal. And it will be a man, not a woman. And definitely not Hillary.

Other than Zell Miller. ANY dem will be labled as "too liberal" Edwards has a Chance. Edwards/Clark might have had a chance.
Comment
notjoe

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 5599
Share

Post
#25

11-03-2004, 06:58 AM

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
And turned off as many men as she would have gained women.

Impossible...there are 2-3 women for every man in the world.
Comment
Peaches

Old broad

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 13933
Share

Post
#26

11-03-2004, 07:29 AM

Jesse Ventura needs to run
Comment
Honez

Confirmed Brat

Join Date: Apr 2003

Posts: 6636
Share

Post
#27

11-03-2004, 07:59 AM

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
And turned off as many men as she would have gained women. This country is not ready for her. Evidence? We elected Bush over a far superior alternative. Not to sound like a broken record, but the new model for getting elected is to appeal to your religiously conservative base, and that means Republicans appealing to religious evangelicals.

These religious maniacs will be drunk with power now because they KNOW they won the election. They know their power. Remember the 80s with the rise of the Moral Majority, and the subsequent Meese Commission and the war on porn?

Its likely to happen again.

Exactly. Bush is already talking of reversing Roe vs Wade to *thank* the religious nuts that voted him back in. His offering last time was to bring Asscrap on board. I see lots of witch hunts in our future.

Your Paysite Partner
Hone at YourPaysitePartner dot Com
Skype - Stressmonkey
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...