Originally posted by modelgigtalent Yes,
I have been told to let her tan just a bit but not over do it.
Look I am not trying to bash you or anything. Just take it from my stand point it's just my opinion. From those pictures that you posted on GFY the 2nd picture no doubt looks atleast 25.
I also agree if she became to tanned on a tanning be that would kill her cute/innoscent 18-19year old look.
She looks like a regular model mid to late 20's Atleast from the pictures provided in GFY.
Originally posted by modelgigtalent Justina is a hot new glamour model that does solo only pics or toys are fine. She has shot with top photographers such as Hank Londoner. She will be in LA until the 15th. Get her while you can! [email protected]
she'd only be hott with some yack on her chin other than that she's just another dumb ho who thinks she's worth something when really she's just a stupid slut
The framing/cropping is ok for me but exposure is bad. I downloaded one of the shots and brought it up in photoshop - it's waaaaaay over exposed. I could tell that just from looking at it here. I tried to bring the exposure down but with a pic this far overexposed, your a little limited as to what you can do with it. Personally, I would rather underexpose my images than overexpose. Once you blow out the details, there's no way to get them back later
her skin tone is fine...else she'll get a fake look over her
No it's not. White skin prints up crap, can't see any "Top Shooter" wanting her until she gets some colour.
Clive Mclean is the guy who shoots most of the "In house" for Barely Legal, Tight do not shoot in house. It's speculative, you shoot the set, submit it and if the editor likes it he buys it.
Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos. With TOP RATIO Sites like
Originally posted by DeanCapture The framing/cropping is ok for me but exposure is bad. I downloaded one of the shots and brought it up in photoshop - it's waaaaaay over exposed. I could tell that just from looking at it here. I tried to bring the exposure down but with a pic this far overexposed, your a little limited as to what you can do with it. Personally, I would rather underexpose my images than overexpose. Once you blow out the details, there's no way to get them back later
Yeah, but remember we are talking porn here.
When I do a shoot, and need 400 images, I don't want to spend a day in photoshop afterwards.
If I am doing a portfolio where I need a dozen great photographs, and I am spending time with the set and lighting, that is very different.
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by charly
[B]No it's not. White skin prints up crap, can't see any "Top Shooter" wanting her until she gets some colour.
Clive Mclean is the guy who shoots most of the "In house" for Barely Legal, Tight do not shoot in house. It's speculative, you shoot the set,
Faria already sold her set to Barely Legal, she has already been sold to Tight. Hank Londoner shot her and loves her. She is shooting with Carl Wachter next week. She is meeting with Hustler next week. She has already met with Suze Randall and Stephen Hicks, they are going to both shoot with her.
Yes, the top shooters want her now.
Web marketing - video editing - color correcting and more. ICQ -165829688
Comment