Quote:
Originally posted by dcortez
No, I don't think it's our responsibility to advocate sex.
But, I do believe it's our opportunity to cut our industry some slack from the fundamentalists without compromising our freedoms by doing what makes sense anyways.
More important, from a plain business model, the members which will sustain your revenues (not flash in the pan thrill seekers who are already bored with even the most extreme content) will pay attention to what you choose to do - this is called catering to and respecting your market.
There are already a lot of themes which don't require rules or laws to stay away from them. This is just one of those things that's not a sacrifice.
Arguing for 'bareback' is no different than supporting taking up smoking with all we know now.
Obviously, there will always be those who are stuck through either habit or mindset to see beyond that.
|
I have no idea what your argument is.
I don't have a problem with content with condoms. I have a problem with people suggesting condomless porn not to be allowed.
Whatever sells, will be produced, as long as it is legal. That leaves us only one way to stop unprotected sex in porn: Banning it. Which fucks with our freedom, and that's why I am against that and against people suggesting it.
Arguing about if sex in porn "should" or "should not" be with condoms is just "blah blah blah" as long as rules and regulations don't change.