Is this graphic "sexually explicit"? (pic poll)

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • MasterBlogger
    So Fucking Banned
    • Jan 2004
    • 1635
    #1

    Is this graphic "sexually explicit"? (pic poll)

    <IMG SRC="http://www.sexeducation.com/10dollar_blowjobs-01/10d-01-blowjobs005.jpg" WIDTH="450" HEIGHT="300" ALT="FREE CONTENT by 10dollarblowjobs.com" >
    9
    1 - NOT AT ALL EXPLICIT
    0%
    0
    2
    0%
    2
    3
    0%
    2
    4
    0%
    2
    5 - EXTREMELY EXPLICIT
    0%
    2
    GFY
    0%
    1

    The poll is expired.

    Tags: None
    • - Jesus Christ -
      Confirmed User
      • Mar 2003
      • 7197
      #2
      What Pedo?
      <img src="http://gofuckyourself.com/images/smilies/NEW/321.gif" width=1 height=999999999999999>
      <img src="http://gofuckyourself.com/images/smilies/NEW/321.gif" width=1 height=999999999999999>
      <img src="http://gofuckyourself.com/images/smilies/NEW/321.gif" width=1 height=999999999999999>
      <img src="http://gofuckyourself.com/images/smilies/NEW/321.gif" width=1 height=999999999999999>
      <img src="http://gofuckyourself.com/images/smilies/NEW/321.gif" width=1 height=999999999999999>

      Amen

        Comment

        • MasterBlogger
          So Fucking Banned
          • Jan 2004
          • 1635
          #3
          - Jesus Christ -
          02-27-2004 06:30 PM This person is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here]

            Comment

            • stev0
              Confirmed User
              • Aug 2003
              • 6801
              #4
              you mean legally? if so then yes....

              but i dont think it's that bad for a tour or something.

                Comment

                • - Jesus Christ -
                  Confirmed User
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 7197
                  #5
                  Originally posted by - Jesus Christ -
                  What Pedo?
                  <img src="http://gofuckyourself.com/images/smilies/NEW/321.gif" width=1 height=999999999999999>
                  <img src="http://gofuckyourself.com/images/smilies/NEW/321.gif" width=1 height=999999999999999>
                  <img src="http://gofuckyourself.com/images/smilies/NEW/321.gif" width=1 height=999999999999999>
                  <img src="http://gofuckyourself.com/images/smilies/NEW/321.gif" width=1 height=999999999999999>
                  <img src="http://gofuckyourself.com/images/smilies/NEW/321.gif" width=1 height=999999999999999>

                  Amen

                    Comment

                    • sexyclicks
                      Confirmed User
                      • Mar 2002
                      • 3240
                      #6
                      Originally posted by - Jesus Christ -
                      What Pedo?
                      <img src="http://gofuckyourself.com/images/smilies/NEW/321.gif" width=1 height=999999999999999>
                      <img src="http://gofuckyourself.com/images/smilies/NEW/321.gif" width=1 height=999999999999999>
                      <img src="http://gofuckyourself.com/images/smilies/NEW/321.gif" width=1 height=999999999999999>
                      <img src="http://gofuckyourself.com/images/smilies/NEW/321.gif" width=1 height=999999999999999>
                      <img src="http://gofuckyourself.com/images/smilies/NEW/321.gif" width=1 height=999999999999999>

                        Comment

                        • MasterBlogger
                          So Fucking Banned
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 1635
                          #7
                          Originally posted by stev0
                          you mean legally? if so then yes....

                          but i dont think it's that bad for a tour or something.
                          Tks ...
                          I've become so desensitized to graphics after ten years. That I'm curious if this graphic violates an AUP of an affiliate program for being "sexually explicit".

                          There are no aroused genitals or reproductive fluids showing - but nudity and a sexually suggestive action being presented.

                            Comment

                            • doornx
                              Confirmed User
                              • Nov 2003
                              • 2531
                              #8
                              it's not something you would post on disney that's for sure

                              even though you don't see the actual closeup of a blowjob it seems pretty explicit to me
                              Send me a PM for design work

                                Comment

                                • BSleazy
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Aug 2002
                                  • 6721
                                  #9
                                  Are you going to put it on sexeducation.com?
                                  icq 156131086

                                    Comment

                                    • MasterBlogger
                                      So Fucking Banned
                                      • Jan 2004
                                      • 1635
                                      #10
                                      Originally posted by doornx
                                      it's not something you would post on disney that's for sure

                                      even though you don't see the actual closeup of a blowjob it seems pretty explicit to me
                                      K ...
                                      ya ...I thought I better contact their tech support and get a clarification.

                                      Like the graphic is after ALL THE MULTIPLE ADULT ONLY WARNINGS ...

                                      As you can tell by the "ignorant moron posts" as demonstrated above - it only takes one fucker to once again "censor" what the silent majority are looking for.

                                        Comment

                                        • MasterBlogger
                                          So Fucking Banned
                                          • Jan 2004
                                          • 1635
                                          #11
                                          Originally posted by BCyber
                                          Are you going to put it on sexeducation.com?
                                          It's already there - I'm just having second thoughts about it.
                                          The new "flavour" of SexEducation.com is going to be "softcore" linking offsite to "hardcore" suppliers for those who are looking for that kind of content.

                                            Comment

                                            Previous template Next
                                            Working...