Quote:
Originally posted by punkworld
Nope. You just have trouble formulating things clearly. If you reply to a post which as the main point has that there are "no go zones" with something along the lines of "bullshit", that is to be interpreted as you denying the existence of such zones - unless you specifically state something different.
It's a pretty logical assumption that someone is responding to the main point of a post unless it's made clear that that is not the case. 
|
Feel free to interpret "formulating things clearly" as you choose to...but it does not mean that you are correct. I maintain that the "whole" of the post was pig shit...and the only factual thing in the post was singular...and that was the "No Go Zones".
No where in the thread did I say he...
"personally made up "No Go Zones"....
"and they did not even exist."...as he stated.
No where in the thread did I deny as you posted..."I quite clearly remember you
"denying they existed a while ago."
Two different posts I made in response and neither of them state that he made up the "No Go Zones"...and/or...that they didn't exist.
Your statement about me
"denying they existed" is not true and you are having a difficult time admitting your mistake...now aren't you?