Quote:
Originally posted by theking
As a whole his post was pig shit...and rejecting as a whole is not rejecting every individual part. The only thing factual statement in the post was the "No Go Zones"....everything else was pig shit. So I repeat...no where did I deny that the "No Go Zones" existed...thus you are clearly mistaken in your original post...are you not?
|
Nope. You just have trouble formulating things clearly. If you reply to a post which as the main point has that there are "no go zones" with something along the lines of "bullshit", that is to be interpreted as you denying the existence of such zones - unless you specifically state something different.
It's a pretty logical assumption that someone is responding to the main point of a post unless it's made clear that that is not the case.
