MSNBC poll over 400,000
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Originally posted by GatorB
Fox poll 99.999% Bush.

Guess it kinda lets you know really how out of touch the media is with the American Public.

NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo!
| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily
| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 |ICQ: 78943384 |Comment
-
-
-
I can't find the fox poll, here are the others,
CBS Kerry 92.5%
CNN Kerry 79%
MSNBC Kerry 71%
and GFY Kerry 80.95%
Nuff said Bush got his ass handed to him.Comment
-
That's actually bad for Kerry. Voters will be less inclined to get out and vote thinking he's got enough support without their vote.
If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Domains
Adult News
KRL's Newsletter
Biz Tips
Just Listed DomainsComment
-
-
-
Don't know if you've read about how well the Democrats are doing in registering new voters or not.Originally posted by KRL
That's actually bad for Kerry. Voters will be less inclined to get out and vote thinking he's got enough support without their vote.
NBC had a couple of bits last nite about how the democrats are outdoing the republicans in registering American voters living overseas. And have read in a couple of different mags how in Florida and Ohio, that the Democrats have been registering new voters (likely democratic natch) at better than a 3-1 ratio over the Repubs.
VERY encouraging!
Comment
-
Announcing the invasion of Iraq on March 19, 2003, Mr. Bush said, ?Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.?
Two months into the war, on May 29, 2003, Mr. Bush said weapons of mass destruction had been found.
?We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories,? Mr. Bush told Polish television. ?For those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them."
On Sept. 9, 2004, in Pennsylvania, Mr. Bush said: ?I recognize we didn't find the stockpiles [of weapons] we all thought were there.?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in646142.shtmlI post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do,
I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.Comment
-
I think this pretty well sums it up:
-------------------
"I'm disappointed in the president's performance," said Allan Ramsey, a 67-year-old retiree who told The Associated Press before the debate that he was leaning toward Bush. "I didn't make much sense of the president's answers."
Angered by the situation in Iraq and the state of the U.S. economy, the Hedgesville, W.Va., man said last week he was open to change in the White House but found Kerry unappealing. That changed Thursday night.
"I was looking for reasons to maybe vote for Kerry, and I think I found them - the point he made about us going to Iraq for the wrong reason, and we don't really have a solution."
Pam Russell, a 55-year-old retiree from Detroit who went into the debate undecided, said afterward she's leaning toward Kerry.
"Bush looked real nervous," she said. "Bush was mad. He kept frowning." "I think Bush, he kept using the same spin and rhetoric instead of him saying something different than he's been saying all the time," she said.
http://www.king5.com/sharedcontent/n....281571d6.html
Comment
-
The Republican in you rears it's head every so often.Originally posted by KRL
That's actually bad for Kerry. Voters will be less inclined to get out and vote thinking he's got enough support without their vote.

Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life
"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."Comment
-
I was VERY suprised by this debate (pleasantly I might add).
Kerry did much better than I thought he would and Bush DEFINITELY did a lot worse than I thought he would.
Bush really had nothing but the line "you're giving mixed messages" which he pounded into the ground ad nauseum and I think nation nauseum.
I watched it on MSNBC where Ron Regean's first words after the debate: "We have an election! Kerry did very well!"
And STUNNINGLY, Joe Scarborough..very right leaning former Florida congressman who does a show on MSNBC came right out and said "I will admit that tonite, Kerry decisively won the debate."
Man..when fellow right wingers are dumping on ya, you know you gave a stinky performance!
Comment
-
Bush got RAPED :POriginally posted by rayadp05I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?Comment
-
An example of the new voter registration drive I talked about earlier:
COLUMBUS, Ohio - A sweeping voter registration campaign in heavily Democratic areas has added tens of thousands of new voters to the rolls in the swing states of Ohio and Florida, a surge that has far exceeded the efforts of Republicans in both states, a review of registration data shows.
The analysis by The New York Times of county-by-county data shows that in Democratic areas of Ohio - primarily low-income and minority neighborhoods - new registrations since January have risen 250 percent over the same period in 2000. In comparison, new registrations have increased just 25 percent in Republican areas. A similar pattern is apparent in Florida: in the strongest Democratic areas, the pace of new registration is 60 percent higher than in 2000, while it has risen just 12 percent in the heaviest Republican areas.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/26/po...gn/26vote.html
Comment
-
One more article about the upswing in new voters:
AP) -- New voters are flooding local election offices with paperwork, registering in significantly higher numbers than four years ago as attention to the presidential election runs high and an array of activist groups recruit would-be voters who could prove critical come November 2.
Cleveland has seen nearly twice as many new voters register so far as compared with 2000; Philadelphia is having its biggest boom in new voters in 20 years; and counties are bringing in temporary workers and employees from other agencies to help process all the new registration forms.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/...new.voters.ap/
Comment
-
From their website
This is not a scientifically valid surveyComment
-
There is a HUGE difference between getting them registered and keeping them off crack long enough to actually go to the polls.Originally posted by Centurion
An example of the new voter registration drive I talked about earlier:
COLUMBUS, Ohio - A sweeping voter registration campaign in heavily Democratic areas has added tens of thousands of new voters to the rolls in the swing states of Ohio and Florida, a surge that has far exceeded the efforts of Republicans in both states, a review of registration data shows.
The analysis by The New York Times of county-by-county data shows that in Democratic areas of Ohio - primarily low-income and minority neighborhoods - new registrations since January have risen 250 percent over the same period in 2000. In comparison, new registrations have increased just 25 percent in Republican areas. A similar pattern is apparent in Florida: in the strongest Democratic areas, the pace of new registration is 60 percent higher than in 2000, while it has risen just 12 percent in the heaviest Republican areas.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/26/po...gn/26vote.htmlComment
-
Comment
-
BoobMaster Posted:
"There is a HUGE difference between getting them registered and keeping them off crack long enough to actually go to the polls."
------------------------
Yes there is, but the point I'm trying to make here is that the many of them REGISTERED ON THEIR OWN! The fact that so many new voters have come forth voluntarily would SEEM to indicate that they plan on voting also.
Comment
-
Comment
-
People cast their votes via their website, for crying out loud. I certainly wouldn't get all giddy over that.Originally posted by Tom_PM
No survey or poll is scientifically valid.
Face it, Kerry shined in this night. There's 2 more to go, and VP's go at it next week.
Yes, Kerry looked very good, and Bush was, well, Bush. He is NOT the most gifted speaker, but there is one thing about him that draws voters: he speaks with great passion. I think you'll be surprised at the public reaction when the REAL polls come out.Comment
-
From your headOriginally posted by boobmaster
From their website
This is not a scientifically valid survey
This is not a scientifically thinking brainLast edited by SuckOnThis; 09-30-2004, 09:09 PM.Comment
-
Originally posted by Centurion
BoobMaster Posted:
"There is a HUGE difference between getting them registered and keeping them off crack long enough to actually go to the polls."
------------------------
Yes there is, but the point I'm trying to make here is that the many of them REGISTERED ON THEIR OWN! The fact that so many new voters have come forth voluntarily would SEEM to indicate that they plan on voting also.
We shall see. The democrats ALWAYS get bigger numbers than republicans in voter registration. However, regiastered republican voters are FAR MORE LIKELY to go to the polls than their democratic counterparts.Comment
-
Boobmaster posted:
Yes, Kerry looked very good, and Bush was, well, Bush. He is NOT the most gifted speaker, but there is one thing about him that draws voters: he speaks with great passion. I think you'll be surprised at the public reaction when the REAL polls come out.
--------------------------
He DOES?
Hmm..well he obviously forgot to show up with his passion tonite!
He seemed almost ANNOYED that he was even there. I think he was upset because he was missing Nick At Nite!

Comment
-
You saw a lack of passion because you DON'T LIKE HIM. It's amazing how blind people can be sometimes.Originally posted by Centurion
Boobmaster posted:
Yes, Kerry looked very good, and Bush was, well, Bush. He is NOT the most gifted speaker, but there is one thing about him that draws voters: he speaks with great passion. I think you'll be surprised at the public reaction when the REAL polls come out.
--------------------------
He DOES?
Hmm..well he obviously forgot to show up with his passion tonite!
He seemed almost ANNOYED that he was even there. I think he was upset because he was missing Nick At Nite!
Comment
-
I copied that quote DIRECTLY from their website. That makes me an idiot? Whatever. I'm not taking the bait anymore. Sorry!Originally posted by SuckOnThis
From your head
This is not a scientifically thinking brainComment
-
Boobmaster posted:
You saw a lack of passion because you DON'T LIKE HIM. It's amazing how blind people can be sometimes.
-------------
There is a REASON I don't like him and that's because his policies are terrible and are putting our country at greater peril!
But even withstanding that..my dislike of him didn't sway what was OBVIOUS (Even Lens just posted that Fox News said Kerry won the debate)..and that is that Kerry plastered Bush all over the wall tonite.
Comment
-
-
I don't think I'd use the word 'plastered'. He did win though. But so fucking what! Do you think one debate is going to have that much of an impact?Originally posted by Centurion
Boobmaster posted:
You saw a lack of passion because you DON'T LIKE HIM. It's amazing how blind people can be sometimes.
-------------
There is a REASON I don't like him and that's because his policies are terrible and are putting our country at greater peril!
But even withstanding that..my dislike of him didn't sway what was OBVIOUS (Even Lens just posted that Fox News said Kerry won the debate)..and that is that Kerry plastered Bush all over the wall tonite.Comment
-
I knew Americans would see right through Bush's bullshit when they took the time to listen to it. That was the first time we got an unbiased view of Kerry and Bush at the same time and the people are speaking!
The only thing is, these numbers will probably change over the next couple days. You'll get people voting who didn't watch it, people who just got their impression from the pundits.
Comment
-
Um ya, but who cares if its not scientific. Is anyone claiming this one poll is the be-all-end-all poll? No. It just temporarily shows what everyone who was watching already knows. Kerry cleaned the floor with Bush.Originally posted by boobmaster
OK! THIS QUOTE WAS ON THEIR FREAKING WEB SITE.
As far as passion from Bush, I saw some feigned pauses and emotion. None of which sounded real. Same with Kerry, tho not as much considering Kerry is pretty monotone.-uno
icq: 111-914
CrazyBabe.com - porn art
MojoHost - For all your hosting needs, present and future. Tell them I sent ya!Comment
-
If its anything like some of the debates in past elections, yes. The most people watch the first debate.Originally posted by boobmaster
I don't think I'd use the word 'plastered'. He did win though. But so fucking what! Do you think one debate is going to have that much of an impact?-uno
icq: 111-914
CrazyBabe.com - porn art
MojoHost - For all your hosting needs, present and future. Tell them I sent ya!Comment
-
You really need to go look up the difference between a scientifically valid poll, conducted by professionals, and a completely unscientific web survey.Originally posted by uno
Um ya, but who cares if its not scientific. Is anyone claiming this one poll is the be-all-end-all poll? No. It just temporarily shows what everyone who was watching already knows. Kerry cleaned the floor with Bush.
As far as passion from Bush, I saw some feigned pauses and emotion. None of which sounded real. Same with Kerry, tho not as much considering Kerry is pretty monotone.Comment
-
WHAT!!!! Fucking Bush LIED!!!!
He said the american people had spoken and he was confident he would be re-elected!!!!
Okay, that's it.... no fruit cake for George this year
Comment
-
Do you really need a scientific poll to tell you Bush got his ass handed to him?Originally posted by boobmaster
You really need to go look up the difference between a scientifically valid poll, conducted by professionals, and a completely unscientific web survey.

Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life
"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."Comment
-
All Kerry did tonight was attack Bush, a strategy which can EASILY backfire. When it comes right down to it, people don't know any more about him than they did five minutes before the debate.Originally posted by uno
If its anything like some of the debates in past elections, yes. The most people watch the first debate.Comment




Comment