Quote:
Originally posted by Groove
Oh for God's sake! I was NOT attacking Lensman! And I was not suggesting
that Lensman is a pedo! You are putting words in my mouth!
I was simply pointing out the fact that Sexeducation was citing Adult.com as one of his supporters in a thread where Sexeducation was being accused of being a pedophile. I did not think that Lens would appreciate Sexeducation doing this, so I started this thread to draw the issue to his attention. Sexeducation has since made several other posts (same thread) citing Lensman as one of his supporters. If this is cool with Lens, fine. But if it were me I would not be amused.
|
The title of your thread was misleading Groove. It says "Lensman a pedophile...". If you would have started a thread saying "Mike Okitch a pedophile...", I would be on you like Homer Simpson on a donut.
I am aware that you did not mean to piss Lensman or anybody off by doing this.
I also understand the purpose of your thread.
But you could have chosen another title.
Just imagine someone starting a thread "Groove a pedophile is using adult.com as a referee". People would read it and think "Shit, Groove is a pedo?" Think of the damage this would do to your reputation! That's the only point I'm trying to get across here.
Cheers
Mike