Quote:
Originally posted by phogirl69
I was debating with my friend and she said she is going to vote Bush and not Kerry because Bush according to her is for "security" while Kerry is not, and because Bush is more experienced. She thinks that everyone wants to bomb the US and she's more in favor of security I guess.. She would rather be more secure but lose personal liberties.
Someone counter argue this so I can use your arguments against my friend and win next time we argue, I'm not too much into politics so couldn't think of a good rebuttal.
|
Bush creates fear better, which makes him better at selling security. He is a master of spin, but he hasn't made us any safer. His only experience is repeatedly being at the right place at the right time.
Kerry is not against security. He just isn't as ignorant or unilateral as Bush when it comes to how he would bring it. Remember also that Kerry has no lack of experience... Bush was a failed minor oil exec. Kerry has been a successful Senator for quite a while.